ZAHIDA MIRZA versus FAYYAD AHMAD, MANAGING DIRECTOR, WASA, LDA
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (5) The contempt of court action for failing to comply with a Labor Court order goes to the accused worker when the benefit of rehabilitation is obtained through labor court. If the t: hour order was not challenged in the appeal, it had already been agreed to be agreed upon and it was reinstated with the employees after the restoration of contempt of court for non-compliance. Not to exclude the possibility that signatures were obtained before writing the documents, the tribunal concluded that it was doubtful whether the applicant had foreseen the right to return his benefits. Under the circumstances, criminal proceedings cannot be prosecuted simply because of the account. The benefit of the doubt will be in favor of the accused and the worker patentee.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
