DIVISINAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE versus SHAH NAWAZ KHAN
Railway employees face criminal prosecution and are kept under suspension, but did not retire due to employment where they were dismissed after accepting a complaint to the Labor Court, the suspension period. Pay and allowance claims were allowed for. i) The employees did not work due to suspension and (ii) did not retire due to a criminal trial even though his age was terminated, and therefore he was not eligible for wages for that period. From where his retirement was justified. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the dismissal order of the Labor Court because the administration allowed the respondent employee to continue working in the job and did not retire, though after the termination of his term, he moved to the Industrial Regulations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969). ), Was eligible for Section 25A. & 38 (3)
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
