MESSRS RAVI RAYON LTD., KALA SHAH KAKU versus WORKERS UNION (REGD.)
Articles 36 and 38 (3a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 postponed the hearing of the practice and procedures for the applicant's evidence, the witnesses sent to the non-present parties and the Labor Court informed the applicant's closing case that Labor The court was told that the witnesses were going to court. And, in fact, a controversial order to close the case was reached after the appellate tribunal rejected the Labor Court's review of the Labor Court's intervention request, though they were required to receive the documents. Was directed by the petitioner's lawyer. The statement can be admitted in proof of such tender if such documents were such.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
