Find a Lawyer

DIRECTOR (O & M) WASA, FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus GHULAM BILAL

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Appellant Benefits Challenging Respondent Worker Removal, Service Has Not Prayed For Rehabilitation Because It Has Found A Better Job And Appellant Employer Service Did not want to be deported and the worker who was hired by the Labor Court has not been found to be stable in the statement of the law that he has been unemployed from the date of his termination of employment to a particular date. Invalid order that worker was disqualified to hack benefits for the period and upheld appeal against the order Was gone The Labor Court also dismissed the appeal filed after the limitation period when time restriction and eligibility were restricted. criminal advocate from Bhakkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes