RIAZ AHMAD versus SECRETARY IRRIGATION
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 1 (4) (C), from the Service Roll to Priuso Distille whereby the Appellant Action was taken against. Neither was on record nor shown to the Labor Court, nor can it be said whether these were legal norms. The respondent employer in his written statement had taken a public objection that the appellant was not an employee. Was a civil servant, but the lower court failed to record any findings and failed to provide respondents with evidence to the point raised in the written statement. To see that the appellant has come under an exception in the definition of el government employee lower, the lower court finding has been set aside and the matter has been remanded for reconsideration. After giving permission to do so
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Chilas lawyer