MUHKUMUDDIN versus THE STATE
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 21 Definition of Evidence / Rigging / Stoning cattle Animal Theft None of the lawyers spoke word of theft by the accused, the trial court convicted the defendant. Their involvement in two cases is one under Section 13D of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 and the second under the validity of Section 1110, CCP, where the evidence of the prosecution is enforced by section 12 (2) of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Ahad) Ordinance. Did not attract the clauses of In 1979, the charge against the accused was wrongly dismissed, and the evidence proved by the trial court to be a crime was irrelevant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Besham lawyer
