NIZAMUDDIN versus STATE
The crime of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the prosecution's evidence was presented by the defendant in the appreciation of section 354 evidence, his sister and his father only commissioned the crime Had caused doubts about. The adultery was forcible and did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the evidence proved beyond doubt that the accused pleaded guilty to his modesty and punished the accused under section 10 (3) of his crime. Used or used criminal force against the victim with the intent to do so. The Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, was set aside and instead was sentenced under Section 354, PPC and was already sentenced to imprisonment, for the removal of whipping. The convict was sentenced, the accused was sentenced to thirty. Sit on one side
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Makli lawyer
