Find a Lawyer

ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N.-W.F,P., PESHAWAR versus ZAFAR IQBAL

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 337F (i) and 34/377 Offenses (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Article 18 Constitution of Pakistan 1973), Article 13 Criminal Code of Conduct (V of 1898), Section 403 of the Act (1984), Article 114 Federal Shariat Court issued a notice to the accused, explaining why his convictions could not be increased if the trial court was not satisfied with the minor convictions sentenced by the trial court. The prosecution also filed a review petition against him on the same charge that the accused took notice of himself and the request for review was not the same as prosecuting the accused. The original trial of the same crime was, however, not subject to further action. The provisions of Article 114 of the Law Evidence 1984 and the proceedings were barred only to the extent of the accused, the trial was not conducted under section 342, PPC, to keep the victims under trial. Wrongful imprisonment, evidence in this regard was not considered in the evidence in the Audi UltraPremium rule because no one can be condemned without a six-month prison sentence. Under 18, the accused was convicted by a trial court. Hodgood's enforcement) The ordinance read with section 777777, PPC was not sufficient for such a felony offense and the maximum sentence could be extended up to 1 1/1 year. Was sentenced to three years in prison. His actual sentence has already been six months \ RI and after the payment of damages he was ordered to be detained in order to avail himself of the better sentence of Section 382B. tax advocates from Garh Maharaja lawyer