Find a Lawyer

BASHIR MASIH versus STATE

The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/16 contradicts the Defendant's testimony in the evidence and in the complainant's statements during the trial, he did not present any evidence to state that Has seen both the perpetrators of the rape prosecution. Do not reinforce the litigation issue because their statements were also subject to certain points, both of the accused, who were originally Christians, requested that they convert to Islam after marriage. As a defense witness, he had proved that both the accused had converted to Islam and that their marriage was in the presence of some relatives of the accused in the trial court's finding that their request to convert to Islam could not be accepted. Because the accused failed to produce any evidence in this regard, he was reprimanded because any charges Such evidence was not required to be imposed. The declaration by the accused was wrong that the goodwill was presented by the accused, it was not challenged by the prosecution before the appropriate forum and as such, the prosecution cannot be dismissed as it was against any reasonable cause against the accused. The suspect was unable to bring home charges beyond the reasonable shadow of the conviction and sentence, and he was acquitted of the charge. registration advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer