Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus GUL AFZAL

The appellate court acquitted the accused on the basis of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3/4 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Sections 417 (l) and 537 on the ground that the complainant police officer also investigated the matter. Was The trial court's finding was denied by the trial court, while it was under the responsibility of deciding the matter as to whether the accused was due to be examined by the complainant's point of view in court. Whether or not prejudice was committed. Drug matters, should be dynamic and in the wider interest of the country and the public at large should also be ignored and the court should consider the whole evidence in the judgment when deciding the case and if it is certain If this case is proved, then there should be punishment. Despite the flaws of such a procedure, the accused will not be eligible to be acquitted despite the illegal or material misconduct of the case when a large quantity of alcohol was recovered and issued an order to discharge the crime as abominable. Was subsequently sent to trial court. tax advocates from Quaidabad lawyer