Section 10 (3) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hoodo) Ordinance 1979 (Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VII of 1961), section 5) Definition of Proof of Defiance Marriage was claimed that the girl was age 16 according to her own mother / 17th year and that the marriage was proved by the three witnesses against whom nothing was said in the cross-examination. The impression of the thumb was not even found. Nika's registration was not necessarily proof of marriage, because in Muslim law a marriage can be performed through presentation and acceptance in the presence of witnesses. Nika's registration will attract fines under section 5 (4). In the absence of any wrongdoing in the marriage of the accused to the girl with the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, the accused was tried and set aside by the trial court and acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
