Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus MUHAMMAD IRSHAD

Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 417 Appeal against the prosecution witnesses named in the testimony of four witnesses to the incident. Was not presented to the trial court, on which the trial court correctly believed that either the witnesses did not see the incident or that no incident had occurred, the trial court had told the complainant Denied that the complainant could not hear the victim's alarm while he was in his home. A two-acre distance from the site of the incident, the trial court dismissed the testimony of the alleged victim on two grounds, before her statement that she was hurt in the face during the incident, her statement before police during the investigation. Was in conflict with. That she should have been "virgin" because she was unmarried, but the lady doctor who examined her did not find her virgin. The lady doctor also had no fresh tears on the victim's vagina and His shalwar was also not stained. The suspect, according to the complainant, shot 2/3 of the shots, but neither the police found the spot, nor did the complainant identify the suspect before the police. Empty, the complainant / appellant failed to show that the findings of the trial court were declared invalid or inconsistent with the facts on the record. The court dismissed the hearing, best law firm from Dadakhel lawyer