Lahore High Court Lahore — Judgments of 2006

2,270 reported judgments of the Lahore High Court Lahore from 2006 — page 23 of 23.

• IKRAM-UL-HAQ v. State 2006 YLR 2977

  The accused, entitled to take advantage of this delay, has long been allowed in the Criminal Lockup for the two-and-a-half month grant to file Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 38…

• MUHAMMAD RASHID v. State 2006 YLR 2979

  Section 9 (c) Conan Shaheedat (10 of 1984), Article 132 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 benefited from the definition of evidence in suspected chief and cross-examination, drug e…

• REHMAT ALI v. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD 2006 YLR 2986

  The trial court dismissed the respondents' filing for the Section 42 trial, but the trial court's order was overturned by the appellate court. Illegal decisions and omissions of any jurisdiction in th…

• KHIZER ABBAS v. State 2006 YLR 2987

  Sections 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 341, 355, 382, 411, 148 and 149 guarantees, the Medico Legal Report's grant disclosed that the complainant falling under section 337 L (ii) Only minor i…

• MUHAMMAD YOUNIS v. State 2006 YLR 2988

  The accused named in the section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337A (ii), 148 and 149 bail, were filed on the occasion after manufacture and armed with accompanying accused. Agaia, …

• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2006 YLR 2989

  Sections 497 (2) and 156b Germany Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Bail, Further Investigator Complainant's oath affirms that he is satisfied with the defendant's innoce…

• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2006 YLR 2991

  Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148 and 149 bail, the accused's grant was merely charged with ineffective firing and was declared innocent by the police during the investig…

• QAMAR-UZ-ZAMAN v. MUNIR AHMAD 2006 YLR 2992

  The trial court for trial, termination, & 13 and (emp (???)) dismissed the pretrial arrest claim against the applicant on the basis that there was neither any request for performance of the tolls nor …

• MUHAMMAD YAR v. MUHAMMAD ARIF 2006 YLR 2995

  The sale in the range of suites to occupy Sections 6, 13 and 31 was made by the approved variable on 31 December 1995, while the date of knowledge alleged by the pre-emptor in his plaint was 20 5 1995…

• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. State 2006 YLR 2996

  Section 497 of the fornication (enforced Jewish) was designated in Ordinance VI (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 16, FIR The alleged abductor with the specific role of kidnapping was sent to the Darul A…

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2006 YLR 2998

  Section 497 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 Prevention and Control of Human Trafficking Ordinance (LIX of 2002), Section 3 bail, refusal of the defendant's previous bail plea…

• SHAUKAT ALI v. State 2006 YLR 3001

  The value of the section 302 (b) evidence was completely opposed to the medical evidence from the ocular account, no identification was paraded and nothing was recovered from the accused, the three ac…

• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. FATEH SHER 2006 YLR 3004

  Inability of Telesh Court and Appellate Court Simultaneous Talks to be inadmissible due to lack of date, time, place and informant justification for Section 6 and 13 cases. Want to make inappropriate …

• MUHAMMAD MOSHIN v. State 2006 YLR 3005

  Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 458 and 459, denied the names of the accused, although not mentioned in the FIR, but by a supplementary statement on the same date co-accus…

• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2006 YLR 3007

  Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail, Danda denial / crime weapon was recovered from the accused, whose name was listed in the FIR and was declared as Danda's wound on the head …

• GHULAM QADIR v. State 2006 YLR 3009

  Section 497 (2) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) bail, further investigation grant requested that the motorcycle from which the alleged drug was recovered was not…

• MAHMOOD-UL-HASSAN v. State 2006 YLR 3013

  Section 497 Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 380, 408, 468, 471 and 109 bail, the accused was legally denied, the accused named in the FIR receipt of various companies in collusion with his co-ac…

• MUNIR AHMAD v. State 2006 YLR 3014

  Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Sections 11 and 10 (3) Guaranteed, the grant of non-registration of the marital charge against the accused was that he had g…

• Haji MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION, SADAR GUJRAT 2006 YLR 3015

  Applying for the constitutional application of Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F FIR, there is no doubt that the application was transferred to the DPO at place R at, and for registra…

• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. State 2006 YLR 3021

  Applicants / suspects have filed an application under Section 404040, CR PC, according to Section 540 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 34 to seek a defense witness according to which…

• HAQ NAWAZ v. BASHIR AHMAD 2006 YLR 3024

  Section 20 Pre-Emission Suits Pre-Importers and Windies are the co-plaintiffs on the basis of the distribution of shares in the suit property between the pre-importers and vendors under section 20 of …

• REFERENCE BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. REFERENCE BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 2006 YLR 3028

  Arts 4 (2) and (3) (a) were a reference by the President of Pakistan against the Special Court respondent, who was the Federal Minister for Petroleum and Natural Resources. He reopened the closed tran…

• LIAQUAT ALI v. State 2006 YLR 3031

  Section 2 30b (b) testimony ation Both the defendants were charged in the FIR due to fireworks injuries, their identities were not likely to be mistaken, eyewitnesses only to Kara Karam distance. Were…

• NOOR alias NOORA v. State 2006 YLR 3036

  The definition of section 302 (b) evidence was ocular testimony consistent and reliable. My relations with the deceased witnesses had no basis to exclude their evidence which has undergone cross-exami…

• MUHAMMAD FAISAL v. State 2006 YLR 3039

  Sections 497 (2) and 561 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c) and 51 (1) guarantee, no further investigation grant was obtained from the physical possession of the a…

• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. NAZEER AHMAD 2006 YLR 3041

  Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 109 bail, the cancellation of the accused was designated in the FIR and its specific role was assigned when the accused investigated after a …

• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. State 2006 YLR 3043

  Before the arrest of the Section 498 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail, the defendant's refusal to issue a check by the accused during the investigation, the defendant Prima Fax…

• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. State 2006 YLR 3044

  Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 bail, even though the incident took place in the middle of the night, the matter was reported to the police with appropriate p…

• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. State 2006 YLR 3046

  Articles 2, 2, 4 304, evidence 30 Sen and evidence 34 Definition of evidence was filed after the initial investigation after the initial investigation and based on the evidence of the trial, the trial…

• MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ v. State 2006 YLR 3053

  Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337 F (i), F (v), L (ii), 148 and 149 bail, the defendant's refusal to shoot the victim's thigh and medical The evidence supported the allegati…

• Mst. NEELAM LADHANI v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, MULTAN 2006 YLR 3055

  Arts 35 and 199 Constitutional petitioner For the protection of the petitioner's marriage and his family, a Hindu girl, Sui Joris, 21, had adopted Islam in her custom and she was a Muslim. Was married…

• IJAZ AHMAD v. State 2006 YLR 3057

  Section 2302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 439 Appeal for review of the increase in conviction The prosecution has established the motions set forth for the trial to be false trial c…

• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD alias PAPPU v. State 2006 YLR 3061

  Sections 497, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 448, 380, 420, 471, 467, 468 and 34 bail, allegedly executed in favor of the accused, denied contract sale, not executed by the complainant Was ma…

• BASHIR KHAN v. State 2006 YLR 3063

  Section 2302 / evidence 34 Accused of Defining Evidence According to the prosecutor's evidence, only Lalakar had picked up and resorted to aerial shootings. Even cross-examination of defense witnesses…

• AFTAB AHMAD v. State 2006 YLR 3065

  Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 459, 458 and 337H (ii) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 18 Bail, Defendant's denial was designated And acco…

• Mst. KAUSAR BIBI v. State 2006 YLR 3070

  Section 302/34 testimony was filled with contradictions and exaggerations in the prosecution case. Witnesses were linked to the deceased and failed to prove their presence on the spot, suspecting the …

• Syed AHMAD SHAH HASHMI v. State 2006 YLR 3085

  Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 440, 448, 468, 471 and 419 bail, the defendant's grant was about 71 years old and the only charge against him was that he was a witness to the all…

• SAIFULLAH v. State 2006 YLR 3089

  The testimony of section 302 (b) of testimony was of benefit to the suspect, and the close association of my witnesses with the deceased was not sufficient to disprove their evidence and to characteri…

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2006 YLR 3095

  Sections 497 (2) and 561 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c), 15 and 51 (1) bail, further investigating the prosecution's grant of its own case were that no narcoti…

• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. SAROO 2006 YLR 3111

  The plaintiffs for the Section 42 declaration purchased the suit land through the suit, claiming that they were the exclusive owner of the property, including the land purchased exclusively by the def…

• LIAQAT ALI v. State 2006 YLR 3114

  Sections 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 bail, denied the day-to-day incident that alleged members of the accused who were allegedly guilty and were charged…

• RIAZ BEGUM v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector District, Khushab 2006 YLR 3117

  Applicant for Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), provisional injunction applying for the Exxonx, RR 1 and 2 suit declaration The plaintiff filed a declaration claiming that he was the owner of…

• Mst. SAIRA SHAUKAT through Special Attorney v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ISALAMABAD 2006 YLR 3120

  ARTICLE 199 The applicant was running overseas to obtain the applicant's service record for filing a constitutional petition in a foreign court, the applicant's husband filed the petition before the d…

• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. MUHAMMAD AKHTAR 2006 YLR 3123

  Appeal for cancellation of Sections 497 (5), Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 336, 337 A (i), 337 F (iii) and 34, upon injury to the person admitted within the dismissal Was designated Sectio…

• PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. JHANG TEXTILE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED 2006 YLR 3128

  Section & 96 & O XXIII, R 1 (1) Appellant Demands to Withdraw unconditional Appeal Counsel for Respondents was advised that since both parties had given full arguments to extend the two hearings. Were…

• IZZAR ALI v. State 2006 YLR 3131

  Section 4 Em4 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979 1979), accused of forfeiting Sections 17 and 22 bail amount for which the applicant was on bail, at the time of trial at the trial court. Did not app…

• SUBHA SADIQ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 2006 YLR 3135

  A IX, R 13 and O XLIII Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 164 and 181 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petitions Putting aside the proceedings without a record of evidence w…

• MUHAMMAD QAISER v. State 2006 YLR 3158

  Four blasts of 30 bore pistols were recovered from the scene during the investigation under the influence of the co-accused as defined in Sections 302 (b), 324 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII …

• MUHAMMAD KHAWAR v. State 2006 YLR 3168

  Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, the complainant's denial was not hostile, unreasonable desire or jealousy of the accused involved in the case, the accused's name …

• GHULAM SHABBIR MALIK v. State 2006 YLR 3172

  The absence of civil suit allegations against the applicants / accused in 1979 was the grant of doubtful charges under Section 497 (2) Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 18 and 22 bail, S…

• NUSRAT v. State 2006 YLR 3176

  The testimony of section 302 (b) of the testimony was from the complainant's complainant who was four miles away from the scene, while the prosecution's second witness was a resident of the same villa…

• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. State 2006 YLR 3199

  Section 497 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail, the accused required for the investigation presented in the challan grant court remained in jail for more than two months; The PC suspe…

• CHAN PEER SHAH v. SHAFI ULLAH 2006 YLR 3229

  Application for Article 181 under Section 12 (2) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 12 (2), the appeal for dismissal by the plaintiff for the declaration of CPC's limitation suit, for a perio…

• SHER MUHAMMAD v. State 2006 YLR 3230

  Articles 302 and 310 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Definitions of Clauses 136 During the appeal hearing against the trial, the applicant / accused, under trial, was requested to make a compromis…

• KARAMAT ULLAH v. ASMAT ULLAH 2006 YLR 3231

  The suit and the appellate suit property for the specific performance of the contracts to sell the section 12 suit were actually owned by the plaintiff's father, before the parsonage of the agreement …

• Master AZMAT v. State 2006 YLR 3234

  Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148, 149 and 109 guaranteed denial of the character of the accused was not equivalent to that of a co-accused whose bail was granted, but h…

• IMDAD ALI v. State 2006 YLR 3238

  Sections 302, 337f (i) (ii), (iv) and 34 definitions of testimony provided by the prosecution's eye witnesses fully supported the prosecution's case. Such witnesses were persistent in their statements…

• AMJAD HUSSAIN v. State 2006 YLR 3242

  Under section 498 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 186 Electricity Act (IX of 1910), bail bail before Section 39A, the sanction of crime under Section 186, PPC was sentenced to three mo…

• MUHAMMAD USMAN v. GHULAM HAIDER 2006 YLR 3244

  The plaintiffs' contention that the performance of section 42 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 573 registration act (XVI of 1908), section 17 civil procedure code (VV 1908), secti…

• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. AKHTAR 2006 YLR 3245

  Section 497 (5) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Pre-arrest Guarantee, Verification of Trial In this order the defen…

• MUMTAZ AHMAD KHAN v. MUHAMMAD AQIF IQBAL 2006 YLR 3251

  A XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 17 (2) suit for recovery of money based on pro-note and suit for defense of exemption, leave submission Despite the rejection of the claim a…

• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. State 2006 YLR 3252

  Articles 2 302, 8 30 ????? Definition of evidence and evidence ??? In the judgment of this case, the trial court observed that according to Section 4 30 PP, PPC, the evidence of Qatil Amad responsible…

• MAKHDOOM AHMED v. ABDUL HAMEED 2006 YLR 3259

  Sections 200 and 201 are being prosecuted for challan case and complaint case and the Secured Criminal Administration requires that both cases were decided at the same time and at the same time, the p…

• Kh. ZIA ULLAH v. P.C.B.L. through Chairman 2006 YLR 3267

  Section 11 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VIII, R11 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Petition, Limitation Delay, Demand of Petition Under Section 11 of the Punjab Unlawful Cooperative Societies…

• SHAUKAT ALI v. State 2006 YLR 3270

  The testimony of Section 2 (b (b)), although the three witnesses were mutual and related to the deceased, falsely expelled the accused from any false desire or enmity against him in the presence of wi…

• MUHAMMAD AFZAL through L.Rs. v. GHULAM HASSAN 2006 YLR 3276

  Under the Lim42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908, 1908), the scope of the declaration against the authenticity of Article 2020 mut mutation is banned. The appellant in the suit was barred from finding that …

• Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID v. MUSHTAQ AHMAD 2006 YLR 3278

  A. XVII, Rr 2 and 3 provided more than ten opportunities for the appellants to present their evidence for damages for defamation, but at every date their evidence was either not available or suggested…

• MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ v. State 2006 YLR 3280

  Section 2?2 (b) and 4? of the testimony praised the case was a triple murder and murderous attack on each other and the accused was a lonely accused and in this case the FIR was lodged with appropriat…

• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. DARA 2006 YLR 3287

  Section 12 statutory evidence (10 of 1984), suits Arts 17, 117 and 118 of the specific performance of the oral contract, partially served by the parties, have occupied the plaintiff on the disputed pr…

• NADEEM WALI v. State 2006 YLR 3308

  The cross-examination of the witnesses, called Sections 540 and 439, the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 353 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7, had two p…

Other years — Lahore High Court Lahore

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.