Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) and 561 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c), 15 and 51 (1) bail, further investigating the prosecution's grant of its own case were that no narcotics were found. Item was not recovered. There was nothing available from the physical possession of the accused to establish the amount recovered from the possession of the accused, was the sale proceeds of any narcotics, the inquiry into the alleged involvement of the accused with the co-accused. After the hearing of the case was presented to the trial court. Physical custody of the accused was not required in the case of investigation, bail for the purpose of investigation is not to be prevented by premature death Nar, Section 9 (c) of the Control of Drugs Act 1997 , Though he has been punished. On the basis of death and the provisions of section 51 (1) of the Act, such a case cannot be guaranteed, but in the appropriate case an accused can be guaranteed. n With the help of the provisions of section 56161A, the CCPC press case guaranteed admission for the accused's bail, the accused was admitted to bail, under the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n best advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer