SUBHA SADIQ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN
A IX, R 13 and O XLIII Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 164 and 181 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petitions Putting aside the proceedings without a record of evidence without the evidence, In the pre-litigation filing filed by the plaintiff / applicants, the defendant / defendant filed a trial against the former party without trial or recording of evidence, before the trial court before the former Parliament Dial Trial Court. Appeared on behalf of Subsequently, the petition was heard on the basis of which the appellate court's defendants / applicants challenged the finding of the lower appellate court. That the defendant filed a review petition against the order of hearing. That the trial court had adopted all the means to obtain the defendant's attendance but the latter failed to appear in the court and the trial court could rightly be prosecuted by the court and vice versa. Both appeal and amendment jurisdiction can be heard. Appeals can be made as a matter of fact; and due to a technical error, no case could be excluded that was revised rather than appealed. Provided that it was filed within the statutory period of limitation, and after meeting other requirements of the law, the plaintiffs had not raised any objection to the revision of the lower appellate court, so they had no such request in the constitutional jurisdiction. Was prevented from taking place, especially when the order passed by the trial court was set aside by the appellate court for tangible reasons and the facts and law of the case were reviewed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
