Find a Lawyer

IMDAD ALI versus STATE

Sections 302, 337f (i) (ii), (iv) and 34 definitions of testimony provided by the prosecution's eye witnesses fully supported the prosecution's case. Such witnesses were persistent in their statements that were convincing and reliable. And there was nothing on record to deny it. In the statements of the witnesses there was no material contradiction or contradiction. Two of these witnesses were injured witnesses and there is nothing to indicate that their persons were hurt themselves or on the occasion of friendly hands incident. While the presence of the above witnesses cannot be suspected at the relevant time, the incident occurred during daylight, witnesses said the knives allegedly provided medical evidence, according to the ocular account recovered from the accused. Was not sent to the relevant offices whether the blood was stained with human blood or not, as there was no recovery cost. There was a defensive version that was thought out and baseless, not understandable, PR was rejected. At the trial, the trial court had sentenced the accused after the trial and the trial court had already declared Had shown tenderness on the matter, in the circumstances had been truly punished or punished. The accused Pakistan, top advocate family court from Gawadar lawyer