Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI versus STATE

Section 2 30b (b) testimony ation Both the defendants were charged in the FIR due to fireworks injuries, their identities were not likely to be mistaken, eyewitnesses only to Kara Karam distance. Were based on There were natural witnesses from the scene of the incident, one of whom sustained injuries to his person at the relevant time. The relationship of the four witnesses with the deceased did not disturb the authenticity of their statements as they had a murder. There was no reason to falsely implicate the accused. The ocular testimony of the case was consistent with the medical evidence which was fully proven and the immediate cause of the incident was the shooting of the two accused and the immediate cause of their death. At that moment, without trial, by the accused, but he fired at the two suspects one after the other, ensuring that his death, targeting key parts of his body, was his death. There was no available hearing reduction case for the reduction of the sentence. In the circumstances and conditions the conviction of the perpetrators was maintained. top advocates from Rajanpur lawyer