Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus STATE

The value of the section 302 (b) evidence was completely opposed to the medical evidence from the ocular account, no identification was paraded and nothing was recovered from the accused, the three accomplices were acquitted. And neither the state nor the complainant had filed an appeal against their case. The accused cannot be identified: Impact of three bad suspects When some accused persons were acquitted on the same evidence, the other accused needed strong and independent cooperation to prosecute, which in the present case is charged. was done. The lantern, who was found innocent during the investigation, was never taken into police custody and was not presented by the prosecutor during the trial and the incident between the FIR and a private complaint There was a contradiction after which the complainant had filed the prosecution case, there were doubts in the circumstances to prove their case against the accused. There is no doubt, the decision of the trial case was set aside and the accused was laid aside. Was acquitted online advocate from Gojra lawyer