MAHMOOD-UL-HASSAN versus STATE
Section 497 Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 380, 408, 468, 471 and 109 bail, the accused was legally denied, the accused named in the FIR receipt of various companies in collusion with his co-accused Used to demonstrate the purchase of various articles. , Which during the investigation by the complainant company, led to a false transaction, the two accused had done considerable harm to the complainant, even if no recovery was made from the accused. It does not matter because in such cases, there can be no recovery. When affected, the accused was using the money he had been charged with, so the first person attracted the prohibition clause of section 497 (1), for approval of the CRPC application bail. Was excluded, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Pasroor lawyer