Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD ALIAS PAPPU versus STATE

Sections 497, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 448, 380, 420, 471, 467, 468 and 34 bail, allegedly executed in favor of the accused, denied contract sale, not executed by the complainant Was made and falsely accused. Prior to this, there were 10 criminal cases, three of which were of the same nature for preparation of fake documents and five were under the Arms Ordinance. The accused was guilty and if he was, the possibility of repeat offenses. Were present. Extension of Bail About the prosecutor's argument that the complainant did not object to the bail approval of the accused, just to say that the offenses in the trial were not permissible, for the grant of bail to the complainant's authority. Cannot be used, but the courts have to deal with justice according to the facts and circumstances of each case, the accused, the first person, was associated with the commission of the crime, which failed to show any cause for its false effect. In the case under Section 467, the PPC was also initially set up against the accused because of the fraudulent amount of Rs. 10 lakh received by the alleged fake documents to the recipient who subsequently transferred his valuable property in favor of the accused. Agreed. This happened under the prohibition clause of section 497, the PC bail application filed by the accused was dismissed inheritance advocates near Mir Ali lawyer