The plaintiffs for the Section 42 declaration purchased the suit land through the suit, claiming that they were the exclusive owner of the property, including the land purchased exclusively by the defendant. Also, after the dismissal of the suit, the legal plaintiff could not be given a declaration of honor. The suit land that was legally sold by the owner in favor of the defendants. The impugned orders were not legally sustainable after the result of the misrepresentation of the evidence, which was set aside by the High Court in reviewing the extent of the land legally purchased by the applicants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
