Find a Lawyer

MST. NEELAM LADHANI versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, MULTAN

Arts 35 and 199 Constitutional petitioner For the protection of the petitioner's marriage and his family, a Hindu girl, Sui Joris, 21, had adopted Islam in her custom and she was a Muslim. Was married to - the petitioner's father, who was an influential man, illegally harassing her and her husband, who had emigrated to hold the MM place, which was her husband's The resident was a resident, a notice was issued to the applicant's father and a meeting was arranged between the applicant and his father. For more than an hour, the petitioner stated that she wanted to be with her husband and did not want to go with her father. Petitioner made a statement after pressing a free or free marriage to a free girl and he also accepted Islam after consideration. Article 35 of the Constitution was binding on the protection of the applicant's marriage. Court directs DPO's place \ m \ to protect the applicant in every way \ r \ n \ r \ n inheritance advocates near Taxila lawyer