IZZAR ALI versus STATE
Section 4 Em4 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979 1979), accused of forfeiting Sections 17 and 22 bail amount for which the applicant was on bail, at the time of trial at the trial court. Did not appear and the petitioner failed to present the accused before a court case. The court justified the imposition of a fine on the applicant in the circumstances. The applicant was guaranteed only on the basis of humanitarian sympathy and not for any economic benefit. And even he was accused of having no attachment to the disappearance of the accused and he is a poor person, having to strike a balance between the applicant with inappropriate softness and illicit intensity. Was a poor person, he was trapped to that extent. The seizure of the applicant's surety bail was maintained, but the penalty amount was reduced from Rs 50,000 to Rs 25,000.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer