Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus STATE

The testimony of Section 2 (b (b)), although the three witnesses were mutual and related to the deceased, falsely expelled the accused from any false desire or enmity against him in the presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident. Certainly everyone said that the witnesses had given a permanent account of the incident and that despite long cross-examination, there was no problem in the authenticity of their statements, in any case, to the police. The delay in reporting the FIR cannot be delayed. The alleged delay in filing the FIR is fully explained, with no result in the circumstances. Medical evidence was in support of the ocular account, the pistol was recovered on identification of the suspect, who was sent to the forensic science laboratory, was not found in the working condition. It is safe to rely on the evidence of recovery. , As no opportunity was recovered from the incident and it certainly cannot be said that it was the same pistol used during the prosecution, under the circumstances, in any case against the accused by a trusted ocular account. Beyond doubt, which was supported by medical evidence and the circumstances of this case This was confirmed in which the accused prayed for a lower sentence. Accused of the fact of the purpose of the weakness and loneliness, the accused was armed with firearms and killed the innocent girl of 20/22 years, no premium could be paid to the accused on the same blow. , Even if its purpose is drowned in mystery, such a case cannot be considered as justification for not imposing a general death sentence. best law firm from Killa Saifullah lawyer