Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAISAL versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) and 561 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c) and 51 (1) guarantee, no further investigation grant was obtained from the physical possession of the accused or anything. The suspect was not involved in the incident. Sitting in the driver's seat of the vehicle and opening the door to the driver's seat recovered the intoxicants and investigated the question of whether the driver was involved with the suspect's accomplice and was aware of the narcotic by the accused on the driver's side. At the time of the decision to investigate the case had been finalized, the accused had no ancient and no evidence of his infamy as he was not involved in any other case of the same nature. In his statement filed by the police officer, the accused stated that the accused was an innocent passenger in a vehicle related offense under Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997. Although the death sentence and the provisions of Section 11 (1) of the said Act cannot be guaranteed in such cases, the defendant can be guaranteed in a reasonable matter which was found suitable for admission of the accused. - To be admitted on bail in respect of the hereditary jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 1 561A, the case of the PC against the accused was where he should have been admitted on bail, the accused was admitted in bail. immigration advocate from Wan Radha Ram lawyer