Find a Lawyer

NADEEM WALI versus STATE

The cross-examination of the witnesses, called Sections 540 and 439, the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 353 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7, had two parts to CR PC ? The first section empowers the ordinary courts to enter any inquiry, trial and other proceedings under the CRPC so that any person may be summoned as a witness or examined by the presence of any person. Even if not called as a witness or any person re-memorizing and re-examining has been granted pre-inspection and arbitration powers. In the court, while in the second part of section 404040, the CCPC gave the court the power to summon, examine, or re-examine and re-examine any person, if his evidence was to be a fair decision in the matter. Which makes it compulsory. In order to summon, examine, recall and re-examine such a person, if the evidence of this case was found to be necessary for a fair decision in this case, the applicant in the present case engaged with a private lawyer. Attempts to re-examine the cross examination of the prosecution were conducted by the state. Counsel for the deprivation of his valuable right to defend himself through the private lawyer of his choice reached the end of the trial based on the second part of section 404040, bound to seek, inspect and reconsider the CRPC Yes, the witnesses ordered that the petitioner's request for reconsideration be denied, stating that the cross examination witnesses were declared without legal authority. pakistani advocates Chak Jamal lawyer