MUHAMMAD YAR versus MUHAMMAD ARIF
The sale in the range of suites to occupy Sections 6, 13 and 31 was made by the approved variable on 31 December 1995, while the date of knowledge alleged by the pre-emptor in his plaint was 20 5 1995. Was. Due to the knowledge of the confirmation of the variability of the sale within two weeks from the notice presented in Sector 31 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, it was considered as recently as 14 2005 was allegedly made by 2005 20 5 1995 was not sufficient for the purpose of section 13 of the Punjab Pre-Empathy Act, 1991, the decision of the appeal and the decree, under which the trial court's order was set aside and the possession of the suit property by pre-evidence. The lawsuit was filed by those wishing to receive, set aside and dismissed by the respondents / former emperors. The trial court's decision and order were upheld
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer
