MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Appeal for cancellation of Sections 497 (5), Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 336, 337 A (i), 337 F (iii) and 34, upon injury to the person admitted within the dismissal Was designated Section 6336, PPC's scope solely on the basis of nerve damage and not due to loss of ear or neck loss, whether section 6 336, PPC was made or No, was the question of further investigation, the other injury respondent / accused has been declared. Under section 337F (iii), the PPC, which was sentenced to three years imprisonment for canceling the bail, was completely different from the grant of bail and the bail cannot be withheld as a punishment. The complainant allegedly misappropriated the bail through allegations of misuse of bail, but he could not prove the same. Such charge cannot be accepted for no good reason. Otherwise, the challan court I was introduced and after submitting a report under Section 173, CR PC, the bail generally should not be revoked. Receipt of bail, without merit, excluded \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Patoki lawyer