Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMIL versus THE STATE

The testimony of the Section 11 evidence was recorded by the trial court for the statements of the victim and the prosecution witness, but due to the absence of their lawyer, both of them were not cross-examined by the accused, to record further evidence. Suspended, but both the victim and the prosecution witness were not obliged to cross-examine on the postponement date, thereafter at the request of the accused filed under section 404040, to re-examine the victim and the prosecution witness. Is seeking, both the victim and the prosecution witness to complete their cross-examination The prosecution's witnesses appeared and were cross-examined, but despite the notices, the non-bailable warrant arrests and the warrant arrests, the victim, who failed in the hearing, has died and in this regard her death certificate court I was produced because the victim was not produced in court. The submission process, which was also registered earlier, could not be read in evidence as the victim had undergone significant accumulation of circumstances, he was also excluded from consideration in the prosecution's witness statement. There was no intimidating material to add, so they could be found guilty and sentenced. Other prosecution witnesses also did not prove any crime in which they were found guilty and sentenced and the accused was acquitted. law websites from Tank lawyer