Find a Lawyer

ANTHENEO DAVID versus THE STATE

Article 3 Validating the evidence, the recovery of 131 capsules containing 1 kilogram and 80 grams of heroin from the accused's stomach was proved by independent and unwilling witnesses, although being a State employee was not an unlawful will or previous hostility to the accused. Which was not known before. They were testified to be heroin to the material recovered from the suspects as Articles 3 and 4 of the Prohibition of Enforcement of Confidence (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 of the Chemical Examiner Prosecution were to be separated and released from each other. Were sentenced separately. And the joint conviction under Art 3/4 of the Order 3/4 of the Prohibition by the trial court was wrong and against the spirit of the law as it tried to transfer heroin powder out of the country by the accused. By concealing inside the body, the accused, under Article 3 of the Prohibition Order, 1979, was sentenced to life imprisonment for a fine of up to fifty thousand on charges of complying with the gravity of the offense. Accordingly the appeal was dismissed tax advocates from Garh Maharaja lawyer