FAZAL REHMAN versus FAZAL REHMAN
Section 396 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (4) Validate the evidence The conviction of the accused as invalid and voluntary was sufficient to warrant his conviction without infringement, but Still, they received considerable certification. Medical evidence was deemed to depend on the evidence of a consistent and stable prosecution, which did not allow the weight of the alleged statements to weigh. The accused committed the indiscriminate and extrajudicial murder of an innocent person who was deprived of the money collected by him. They do not deserve any relaxation and in the circumstances the punishment of the accused has been maintained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Mari Indus lawyer
