Find a Lawyer

STATE versus HAZARATULLAH

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 417 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 accused, appealed against truck driver's charge of breach, that was, ten4 carton tinctures containing 494 bottles. The truck driver who was recovered confessed to retrieving the cartons from his truck, but said the cartons were handed over to the Inquiry Agency, which was supposed to be transported to a medical store. Blitzs were made from and he was looking. When the police arrested him and seized his registration book and truck with buckets and receipts for delivering the goods to the aforementioned medical store, the trial court acquitted the accused because Had a cat and a receipt which fully supported the defendants' request. He was routinely handed over to the medical store, the High Court accepted the appeal against the trial court-approved bad order. Recovering the cartons from the accused's truck and his articles were not denied, the accused High Court, accepting the appeal against the accused's verdict, decided with the trial court's order that the trial court prosecution's agency be the real culprit To detect the virus. In addition to the owner of the medical store as well as the person who initially brought the goods to the forwarding agency, in the absence of such an investigation, the person who was in possession of the cartoon containing the prohibited goods would only carry the goods. According to the driver's statement it will be impossible to convict. The forwarding agency handed them over to them and pleaded guilty immigration advocates email from Mehmood Kot lawyer