Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAYYAB versus THE STATE

Additional Sessions Judge to hear appeals for appreciation of evidence, Arts 3, 4 and 27 of the Order 9 (C) of the Drugs Ordinance 1997 and 48 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4 and 27, A judge, who also controls the Special Court for Narcotic Substance, filed cases under section 9 (c) of the Anti-Drug Control Act of 1997 under Art 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Limitation) Order 1979. I made the decision. And convicted / appealed under two separate offenses under the law, appealed for conviction under Section 9 (c) of the Drug Control Act, 1997, before the federal The Shariat Court had earlier charged the High Court in its appeal before challenging the sentence. The sentence given to them under Article 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order, 1979, was not filed by the Federal Shariat Court at the regular hearing because the question arises whether the Federal Reserve Shariah Court has the authority to hear the appeal. What, especially when the accused / appellant was convicted under Article 4 Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979, was less than 2 years old, before the accused returned the appeal memorandum to present the same? Prayed for The High Court directed the Federal Shariah Court to withdraw the appeal filed before the High Court for the Prohibited Order of Article 27, the 1979 appeal before the High Court, which sent the same to the High Court. Will do Against this, other appeals have already been filed in the case under Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act 1997 to prevent a dispute of opinion against the same decision as justified. best advocate from Faisalabad lawyer