Find a Lawyer

MST. SHARMAN versus THE STATE

The Criminal Procedure for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (2) and 16 of the testimony was filed by the FIR suspect himself, in which he charged himself with kidnapping against the accompanying accused and the acquitted accused. Who was allegedly named by the armed men. A gun and a pistol were allegedly charged by a female accused of committing adultery by a co-accused, and she was on her stand until the last trial before she filed a constitutional petition in which she filed Told the same story under which it was recorded. The FIR alleges that the police officer made an unverifiable statement about the female suspect's role, eroding the fact that her son-in-law, who appeared as a prosecutor's witness, supported the defendant's statement. During the cross-examination, Syed's witness also stated that the woman had informed the police about the incident of the abduction if the woman was a woman of loose character and bad reputation, the witness did not come to make a statement in her favor. The accused woman had consciously kept her away from the other accused in order to engage with a lawyer for defense. Instead, he made positive statements against the co-accused. On medical examination 18 days after returning home, positive report received from Chemical Examiner's office was dismissed and the accused woman was acquitted and ordered to be released. pakistani advocates FR DI Khan lawyer