Find a Lawyer

SPEEN KHAN versus MUHAMMAD HASSAN ULLAH

The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 Explanatory Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Review Request The Sessions Court moved the case by an unidentified order to a judicial file ? The trial magistrate, in keeping with this case, did not attract Section 12 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and, because of the case under Section 377, was not admissible by the PPCC Sessions Court. Was. They were taken to another location where they were subjected to physical abuse by the accused. These were two separate and separate locations and although the actual distance between them was not available on the record, it is still the fact that the kidnapper was arrested. It was shown that the aforementioned distance was sufficient and that the foot session could not be covered by the court, so, without recording any evidence, especially the statement of the victim, did not conclude. It is likely that the first part of it was not attracted to the Section 12 Ordinance, so the decision was put aside and its The matter was remanded to the sessions court with the consent of the parties. how to become a advocate from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer