BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Sections 14 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 203 DD review application was read under the jurisdiction of the courts, under section 14 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979, which was specially referred to as sessions. Was declared a viable hearing. In view of the provisions of section 24 of the said ordinance and the trial by the magistrate in this case was unusual, the accused has been sentenced and sentenced to more than two years imprisonment, Similarly, the Federal Shariat Court was capable of entertainment and decision-making. According to the above law, the appeal and the sessions court are not appealed because neither the trial court had the jurisdiction to hear the said offense, nor was the sessions court able to entertain and decide the appeals decisions of both the courts. The session of this case has been remanded to the judge so that a new hearing can be pted according to the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Abbaspur lawyer