Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE


Sections 14 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 203 DD review application was read under the jurisdiction of the courts, under section 14 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979, which was specially referred to as sessions. Was declared a viable hearing. In view of the provisions of section 24 of the said ordinance and the trial by the magistrate in this case was unusual, the accused has been sentenced and sentenced to more than two years imprisonment, Similarly, the Federal Shariat Court was capable of entertainment and decision-making. According to the above law, the appeal and the sessions court are not appealed because neither the trial court had the jurisdiction to hear the said offense, nor was the sessions court able to entertain and decide the appeals decisions of both the courts. The session of this case has been remanded to the judge so that a new hearing can be pted according to the law.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Lalamusa lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.