Supreme Court — Judgments of 1970
478 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1970 — page 1 of 5.
- HUSSAIN BAKHSH v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI 1970 PLD 1
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 98 Civil Procedure Code (V0 of IS08), read with Sections 114 and O XLVII, r 1, the High Court is free from the power to redress errors in the exercise of its inhe…
- AFILUDDIN BROS LTD. v. PAKISTAN JUTE BALERS 1970 SCMR 1
Under Miscon Misconduct, what is the commercial arbitration under the arbitration clause contained in the contract under which the rules of the Chamber of Commerce Rules of Procedure were to be regula…
- MOSTAQUE AHMED v. ANIL DAS 1970 SCMR 5
Under Miscon Misconduct, what is the commercial arbitration under the arbitration clause contained in the contract under which the rules of the Chamber of Commerce Rules of Procedure were to be regula…
- NAZIR AHMAD v. STATE 1970 SCMR 7
Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898) Sections 54 and 56 of a completely different section, which is not controlled by section 56, were charged by the constable with the police constable, without arrest …
- MUHAMMAD AZIM KHAN v. DISTRICT TRIBUNAL, MIANWALI 1970 SCMR 9
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Arts 58 (3) and Order 98 As the High Court passed in a writ petition relating to a criminal case, a special leave application to appeal such an order was granted on on…
- FEROZE DIN v. K. M. MUNIR 1970 SCMR 10
Criminal Procedure Code (V9 of 1898), section 476 should not be prosecuted under section 476, no such action in the public interest, nor to the satisfaction of personal injury, nor to the criminal pro…
- MUHAMMAD LUQMAN v. THE STATE 1970 PLD 10
The murder conviction of Section 302 must be reliably and firmly relied upon by the evidence which may be guilt-free and cannot be relied solely on the high probability that the Evidence Act (I of 187…
- TAWAIB KHAN AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE 1970 PLD 13
Section 302 declarations of death are sacred under the law, but no strict law can be formulated that in the immediate fear of death this person cannot be called anything but the truth. Like the statem…
- AHMAD DIN v. THE STATE 1970 PLD 21
The Code of Criminal Procedure (CR PC) Sections 288 and 337 and the Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Sections 133, 145 and 157 passed in the court and the session file was transferred under section 288, CR P…
- ATTA MUHAMMAD v. KHADIJA BEGUM 1970 SCMR 24
Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Schedule, Part 1 House was already transferred to K which was incorrectly listed on the checklist and moved to A. In the name of whi…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. NAWAB BIBI 1970 SCMR 25
Explain the delay in the limit of every day, Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O XIII, r 1…
- MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF THE PANJAB 1970 SCMR 26
Explain the limitation of filing a petition in the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O. XIII, r 1…
- IQBAL BEGUM v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 27
The boundaries of the two houses of the laced homeless persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), the first schedule, Part I, were clearly stated by the Settlement Authorities and …
- NAZEER AHMAD SHAH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1970 SCMR 28
The Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, O XXVI Review Issues are fully considered in the decision, cannot be allowed to be discussed again by way of review.…
- BEGUM B. H. SYED v. MST. AFZAL JAHAN BEGUM 1970 PLD 29
Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, with regard to the displacement authorities in relation to the Transfer of Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of …
- CHIRAGH DIN v. CHAIRMAN, THAT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1970 SCMR 29
Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXIX, rr 1 & 2 Under the use of legal decree, the plaintiff has no jurisdiction over direct restitution within rr 1 and 2 during the issue of cross-examination by th…
- SIRAJ DIN v. SAGHIR-UD-DIN 1970 SCMR 30
Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 497 X-ray Examination, VK's Guaranteed Age Proves 17 Years 17 Years…
- HOME SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. JAN MUHAMMAD 1970 SCMR 32
The West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (VII of 1963), Articles 3 and 25, allow the Commissioner to consider the question of the special leave of appeal before the Commissioner ordering the acc…
- FAIZUL HAQUE KHAN v. ABDUL HAMID 1970 SCMR 33
Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation), Act (XXXXX8 of XXIII), Shadt Part I moved the house on a mere receipt basis indicating that he had filed an NCS form. The Supreme Court considered t…
- ABDUL MAJID v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 34
Question regarding interpretation of provisions in Supreme Court Rules, 1956, AXXVI Review Law. I request that another interpretation is possible. There is no scope for review.…
- CHAIRMAN, WEST PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. M. A. K. TARIN 1970 SCMR 35
West Pakistan Agricultural Development Corporation Ordinance (XXI of 1961), question of construction of section 25 section 25, Special Court of Appeal allowed Supreme Court to consider the question…
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN v. MAKHDOOM SYED GHULAM MUJTABA SHAH 1970 PLD 37
In the provisions of the simultaneous reading of A VII, r 11 and section 149, Relief did not claim that the insufficient seal was written on the papers.…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. MUHAMMAD SAEED-UZ-ZAMAN 1970 SCMR 37
The Registration of Claims (IDPs) Act (III of 1956), Section 7 (3) Registration of Claims, (Homeless Persons) Rules, 1955, has been read with r 6 (2A), in the Provo Claims Commissioner Amendment. He h…
- ZULFIQAR ALI KHAN v. MUHAMMAD MUBARAK KHAN 1970 SCMR 38
The exercise of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner's powers of the Chief Settlement Commissioner, delegated to him under section 30 (2) of the Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958 (s), in exer…
- NAWAZA v. THE ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, GUJRAT 1970 PLD 39
Constitution Pakistan 1962 Article 98 Question of fact The High Court, in the jurisdiction of the writ, does not decide the disputed questions of fact if the fact is discovered on the basis of any evi…
- ABDUL SALAM v. CHAIRMAN, WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1970 SCMR 40
West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (XXXI of 1958) and Statute of Pakistan (1962), Article 177 Not entitled to Protection of Art 177, Constitution of Pakistan (1962)…
- MUHAMMAD HAFIZ ULLAH v. GHULAM YASIN 1970 SCMR 41
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 sufficient ground for rejecting relief in delay in registration of applications…
- KARAM KHAN v. WEST PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1970 SCMR 42
West Pakistan Agricultural Development Corporation Ordinance (XXV of 1961): S: 17 (i) and Colonial, Government Land 0 \ Injb) Act (V of 1912)), Government land under tenant as a tenant under the colon…
- MESSRS BADRI NARAYAN AGARWALA v. MESSRS PAK JUTE BALERS LTD 1970 PLD 43
The Arbitration Act 1940 Section 33 Construction Award was filed to rule the contradictory party of the court in response to which they never questioned entering into an agreement, the existence of an…
- SHABBIR HUSSAIN v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 44
A petition was filed against the Art of the Settlement Authority on the request for a change in the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 and the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII o…
- ZULFIQAR v. THE STATE 1970 PCRLJ 47
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 396 is resting on the recovery of the case against the accused. For example, eight items of clothing were found in the recovery memo but there was no evidence that the …
- GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN v. FEROZUDDIN SABRI 1970 SCMR 47
In the nature of the discovery of the request for deletion or clarification of some of the observations made in the judgment of the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O, XLIX, r 6, the observations were not e…
- NAWAB KHAN v. HAJRA BEGUM 1970 SCMR 48
Right to Refuse to Interfere in the Jurisdiction of the High Court, in the exclusive jurisdiction of the Settlement Powers, Schedule, Question of Part I, Distinction of the Homeless (Compensation and …
- MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN 1970 SCMR 50
Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXII, r 3 (2) Applicants applying for the enforcement of legal representatives of the deceased two years later and the defendant living within a distance of only two m…
- KARAM BAKHSH v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF 1970 SCMR 51
Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act XXVIII 1958), Seed, Part II Shop has been transferred to the claimant as a unit on its CS Pharma, without the person being a party to the matter with…
- MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1970 PLD 51
West Pakistan Reconciliation Courts Ordinance 1961 Section 18 The jurisdiction of the Criminal Courts, under Section 18, arises only for the hearing of an identifiable case where a police investigatio…
- AZMAT ALI v. GHULAM RASUL 1970 SCMR 53
The Electoral College Act (IV of 1964), read with Section 58 Electoral College Rules, 1964, prescribes the ballot paper as well as the count of the Tribunal's counters on the Presiding Officer Electio…
- BATUL BEGAM v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 54
The dispossession of the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Section 2 and Schedule, Part I, the question of fact should not be documented by the Settlement Authoritie…
- PAKISTAN EXPRESS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. v. REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES 1970 SCMR 55
The Cooperative Society Act (VII of 1925) [such as the West Pakistan (Adaptation and Cancellation of Laws) Act (XVI of 1957, Section 3 (3), Schedule III], Section 71 (2) (G) and (GA)) Read with the So…
- HASAN DIN v. CHIEF ENGINEER, WAPDA 1970 SCMR 58
The Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 Other remedies fail to benefit from open public treatment…
- YOUSUF ZAMAN v. ROSHAN ALI 1970 SCMR 59
A copy of the judgment of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 12 (2) applies on the same day that the judgment ruled that it must be counted twice on that day for the expiry of the counting perio…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD HAYAT 1970 SCMR 60
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance (VI of 1959), Section I5 The Vent High Court exercised discretion as per the court rule in the second appeal against the rent controller's order and whether the o…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. CHAIRMAN, THAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1970 SCMR 61
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) The dispute between the decisions of two division benches of the same High Court approves the special leave appeal by the Supreme Court to authorize art on…
- ABDUL LATIF v. JAMAL DIN 1970 SCMR 62
The Supreme Court Rules, 1956, the court informing the Attorney General of AXIX, states that neither the lawyer nor the client is willing to cooperate in filing the brief.…
- BURMAH-SHELL OIL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTING CO. OF PAKISTAN LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 63
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3) Order passed by the High Court on the difficult question of law, the first decision of the special leave of appeal by the Supreme Court…
- ABDUL HAKIM AND 2 OTHERS v. SAADULLAH KHAN AND 1970 PLD 63
Rule 1908 Section 105 (2) and O II, R2 and OXL, r 23 The remand order remand appeal is authorized by the appellate court at a preliminary point, but no appeal is final and cannot be aggravated. Under …
- ALLAH YAR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1970 SCMR 64
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 177 Individuals holding temporary office under the temporary control of the department said that the service could be terminated on 15 days. Could not attract …
- RIAZ K. HAQ v. SAID K. HAQ 1970 SCMR 65
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3) read with Supreme Court Rules 1956, O XXXV Request for Special Leave for Appeal, on the request of the parties, postponed.…
- REHMAT ULLAH v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 66
The applicant's illness was not found to be delayed in filing the petition because of the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, XX, r 1, as he was also completely disqualified from giving written instructions to…
- ABDUL SHAKOOR v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 67
The Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 can rightly deny the question of fact in the jurisdiction of the High Court writ…
- THE RIVERS STEAM NAVIGATION CO. LTD. v. THE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF BAKARGANJ 1970 PLD 67
Carrier Act 1865 Section 8 does not require the privatization of a contract between the owner and the carrier of the ordinary carrier for the loss due to his own negligence, whether to carry the carri…
- GHULAM NABI v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN 1970 SCMR 68
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 The fact that a second view of evidence on the record is possible is not an interference with the jurisdiction of the writ…
- MANGLI v. SUHAGI 1970 SCMR 69
The Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 was dismissed on civil merit, not on merit, on the basis that civil courts have no jurisdiction. The passerby has already been agitated by the issue. Th…
- FAZAL DIN v. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD 1970 SCMR 70
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 The question of fact cannot be raised in the jurisdiction of the writ for the first time…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. AISHA 1970 SCMR 70
Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OX, r 9 Ex parte decree has been revoked because the plaintiff was wrongly reported to the plaintiff by a plaintiff and an uneducated woman, in which case, the High Co…
- MUHAMMAD AHMAD ALIAS MAHANDA v. THE STATE 1970 PLD 72
Section 288 Section 288 The statement of the witness, recorded after the compilation of the court, was once admitted into evidence under section 288. A particular piece of evidence has been found to b…
- MUHAMMAD TUFAIL v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 73
The Homelessness (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958) [as amended by the Law on Homelessness (XIII of 1964), Section 14 Section 14A Amendment protects the rights of mortgages and their obligations I …
- ALAF DIN v. MST. PARVEEN AKHTAR 1970 PLD 75
Appeals to the West Pakistan family under Articles 5 and 20 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), section 488 and section 488 of the Rehabilitation Or…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHAN v. BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST PAKISTAN 1970 SCMR 76
The Supreme Court Rules, (1956), Twelfth, RI, and Constitution of Pakistan, (1962), Article 58 (3), in filing a special leave appeal petition, delayed the request for information about the lawyer. I w…
- KOHINOOR INDUSTRIES LTD. v. ABDUL MAJID 1970 SCMR 77
The Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the application for filing a case of A XXXIII Pharma Papyrus Claim is banned but there is a question of limitation, in which case, a complex application, cannot be …
- ABIDA v. MUHAMMAD BOOTA 1970 SCMR 78
The Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX88 of XXVIII), the Shadow Part Settlement Authorities, which presents two survey numbers as one and the same property, even though the wri…
- THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER INVESTIGATION CIRCLE I DACCA v. SULAIMAN BHAI JIWA 1970 PLD 80
The words read with the Finance Act, 1964, with section 34 (2d) of the Income Tax Act 1922, have been interpreted from time to time to be considered in respect of the assessment or reassessment cancel…
- KHUDA YAR v. STATE 1970 PCRLJ 81
In the absence of conviction under Pakistan Penal Code Section 307/149 Sentence 307/149, it has been found that at least five persons participated in the attack.…
- FAIZU v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KACHHI 1970 SCMR 81
West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation [Martial Law Regulation No. 64 (CMLA) s], Para 21 Memorandum by the Deputy Land Commissioner 27 4 66 and Martial Law Regulation Number for Termination of Terminati…
- MURAD BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ 1970 SCMR 83
Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXII, rr 3 & 11 Lack of Appeal If the High Court's case was correct, in this case, because of the desire of the legal representatives of these individuals, their entir…
- SHABBIR HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 1970 SCMR 84
The Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (Schedule VI88 of XXVIII), Schedule 1, is the first question whether A or B were already allotted or settled on such a matter in the High Cou…
- SARDARA v. GHULAM RASUL 1970 SCMR 87
The Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the section 497 bail granted by the High Court, was rejected by the Sessions Judge because the Supreme Court refused to appeal where the bail was granted. Can't…
- ZAHOOR AHMAD v. ABDUL AZIZ 1970 SCMR 88
Exemption cannot be obtained before the High Court in the writ jurisdiction of the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Schedule I, Division I, to the ability of the…
- ABDUL HAMID v. MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM 1970 SCMR 89
The Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of XX88 195), Schedule, the Part Fair Division of the House between the Family Parties, in which all members of the same Family Order…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. RAHIMUDDIN 1970 SCMR 90
Rules of the Electoral College, 1964, r 34 Special interpretation of the rule, for appeal to a special court which is under consideration of the Supreme Court.…
- KHAIR DIN v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 92
Homelessness (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Section 14 Settlement Options that can redeem mortgage-leased land at any time on mortgage payment.…
- MUHAMMAD ISLAMUDDIN v. EJAZ HUSSAIN SHAH 1970 SCMR 93
The Chief Settlement Commissioner is capable of dividing the property into separate units and distributing the units to the Homeless (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), the Schedul…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX EAST PAKISTAN v. MESSRS AYURVEDIC PHARMACY (DACCA) LTD 1970 PLD 93
Sections 7 (1) and 8 (2) of the Sales Tax Act, 1951, once again go beyond the scope of the Tax Exemption Goods Act and their gross tax under section 7 of the Central Government Notification No 5, Sect…
- MUHAMMAD DIN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1970 SCMR 94
(a) Landless Settlements Act (XLVII 1958) 14 The mortgages of evacuees have more than just property taxes and their rights are denied. In such written request, circumstances, held, properly dismissed …
- MEBRAJ DIN v. WEST PAKISTAN PROVINCE 1970 SCMR 96
The Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), I IX, r 13 The former part order was passed due to errors in the court's failure to comply with the previous order of the parties, which was properly held by the …
- LT.-COL. FARZAND ALI v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF WEST 1970 PLD 98
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Arts 178 (4) (b), 103, 109 and 110 and Constitution (Third Amendment) Act (IV 1965), Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act (XV 1965); Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act (19…
- MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS) 1970 SCMR 98
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 The question of fact lies in the writ jurisdiction of the High Court.…
- MUHAMMAD NAJIBULLAH KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1970 SCMR 99
The Martial Law Regulation No. 89 (CMLA) s rule cannot prevent victims from being involved in the subpoena and challenge the proceedings, resulting in the writ petition constitution of Pakistan (1962)…
- ABDUL AZIZ v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL, SARGODHA 1970 SCMR 102
Section 60 and Electoral College Rules, 1964, r 36 (I) (IA) The Election Petition Ground that the Presiding Officer had declared the applicant's signature sheet polling agent illegal was prohibited an…
- TAJA v. CROWN 1970 PCRLJ 103
In this case, the other is very interested in being dependent on section 133 of the Criminal Evidence Act (of 1872), in section 302, the two offenders one of whom is cleared.…
- CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT COUNCIL, JHELUM v. ALI AKBAR 1970 SCMR 105
(a) The Basic Democracy Order [18 of 1959], read with Article 60 Fifth Schedule, Item 7 Do not consciously use the word to indicate that simple employment is excluded from the category of taxation aut…
- BABU KHAN v. CROWN 1970 SCMR 107
(a) the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 405 and 408 and Corruption Act 1947), Sections 5 (1) (c) and 6, which are entrusted with the sale of Sanders by the Department of Railways. Legal act…
- IFFAT BEGUM v. RASHIDA BEGUM 1970 SCMR 114
Act (XXVIII of 1958), Schedule, Part IA and B Transfer of the house claim that upon the removal of A, B, the entire house was moved to B without any opportunity to be heard and A was transferred to th…
- SARGODHA-BHERA BUS SERVICE, SARGODHA v. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY 1970 SCMR 117
Order of the RTA Directive Survey (R) Directive Survey, as prescribed under section 50 (1) of section 50 (1) of the West Pakistan Motor Vehicle Ordinance (XIX of 1965), cannot be delayed Because no ru…
- MUHAMMAD AFSAR v. ALLAH DITTA 1970 SCMR 118
(A) The Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), Section 38 Occupancy Tenancy, cannot be considered partially because the possession of certain shareholder tenants is subject to a substantial amount of incom…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 120
Schedule Part Definition of Occupation Schedule, with section 2 and notification of the Central Government, section 2 and the notification of the Central Government, Act 7 3 60 are considered to exten…
- ANSAR HUSSAIN v. RASHIDA BEGUM 1970 SCMR 121
Removal of the two disputed orders passed by the Settlement Authorities in the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (VI8 195 of XXVIII), Part I, High Court writ jurisdiction and remand t…
- JAMAL SHAH v. SECOND ELECTION TRIBUNAL, WEST PAKISTAN 1970 SCMR 123
In another case, the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3), was passed by the Supreme Court Point of Law, in which special leave of appeal has been granted following the demand for clarifica…
- ASHIQ ALI v. DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 126
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 62 and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, AXXVI Review cannot be obtained with the latest evidence review.…
- ABDUL KARIM BUTT v. CROWN 1970 PCRLJ 127
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 561 decision to dismiss remarks requesting that the plea be dismissed without hearing.…
- KHADAM HUSSAIN v. ATA MUHAMMAD 1970 SCMR 127
(b) The Colonization of Government Land (Punjab) Act (V of 1912), section 36 lands belonging to the cemetery and dedicated to the charitable and religious purpose. Worth the jurisdiction of. Civil Cod…
- A. H. MINHAS v. GHULAM AHMAD 1970 SCMR 128
The Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958); Schedule, Part I, whether a writ of jurisdiction applies to a particular house in the High Court, whether or not it is capable o…
- AZIZ-UR-RAHMAN v. HABIB BANO 1970 SCMR 129
Whether the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Shade, Part I must submit a form of CH in respect of a particular house by submitting an application in Form E for parti…
- INAYATULLAH v. ABBAS AHMAD KHAN 1970 SCMR 130
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), I IX, r 13 The previous decree was passed, without any evidence being recorded, on the basis that the defendants were absent only on the basis of this decree that the…
- LABHU v. MUMTAZI BEGUM 1970 SCMR 131
Twelfth, r1 Delay conditions, not out of applicant's control…
- THE CHITTAGONG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY v. C. S. LIMITED 1970 PLD 132
Under the Companies Act 1913 Companies Act (VII of 1913), Section 12, Section 12 (3) (x) is not expected to benefit a person or party's property and its assets. No such party or individual has any loc…
- AHMADI BEGUM v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1970 SCMR 132
The displacement of displaced persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Schedule II, is considered to be split into two parts and transferred to their respective occupants, under …
- NOORA v. MUHAMMAD 1970 SCMR 133
Section 152 Declaratory suit amended that M was the sole heir of the AM had inadvertently failed to include in some of A's plots: fair and fair that M should be allowed to apply for correction. ?…
- GHULAM RASUL v. ABDUL AZIZ 1970 SCMR 134
Section 60 read with the Electoral College Rules, 1964, r 36A and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), the Article 98 Election Petition raised eleven grounds in the petition but the Election Tribunal reco…
- MUZAFFAR KHAN v. CHANNAN KHAN 1970 SCMR 137
The Constitution of Pakistan (1962), pursuant to Article 98 High Court, pursuant to the Tribunal's order, sought the petitioner, in any case, to consider whether the writ was allowed to interfere with…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.