Supreme Court — Judgments of 1969
519 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1969 — page 1 of 6.
- GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN v. MURZUQULLAH 1969 PLD 1
Rules (Continuity) Order 1959 Article 6 (5), sub-clauses (a) and (b) (whereby the Governor must exercise his powers of Article-by-Deputy-Magistrate from any other law Beyond and be free - is ineffecti…
- MUHAMMAD YUSUF v. HASAN DIN 1969 SCMR 1
Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 Limitation, Application of a Mixed Question of Law and Reality Submitted to the High Court, which is not permitted to enter the question…
- ZAFAR SARWAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 2
The bail plea against the order dismissing the bail plea of the special leave appealed by the accused in the bail murder case was denied by the magistrate bail before the transfer of a new request for…
- ABDUL QADEER v. ABDUL HAMID 1969 SCMR 3
Provided by the Supreme Court for consideration of the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of VI 18588), Part I…
- MIRAJUDDIN v. DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES 1969 SCMR 4
Government employees refuse to exercise their discretionary powers on the basis of the writ writ 98 writ petition on the basis that the applicant for the first time violated an order of irregularity a…
- GHULAM FATIMA v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 5
Article 62 Review The fact that the plaintiff is not satisfied with the provision of a particular law as the court has given a ground for review…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NORTH ZONE, WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE v. Mst. FATIMA BIBI 1969 PTD 5
Section 16 (3) (a) (ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 (as agreed in 1965) entered into the benefits of a modest partnership in which the mother was a partner, the combined income of the minor children, …
- SERAJUL ISLAM KHAN v. AHSAN ALI MONDAL 1969 PLD 5
Sections 23, 53 and 58 of the Electoral College Act 1964 have been read along with the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Arts 157 and 158 as to how long the electoral list should be registered and to w…
- ABDUL MAJID v. NISAR AHMAD 1969 SCMR 6
The question is whether on the facts of the case found under section 300 (4) of the High Court exception (4), the PPC was requested to be converted to an iction sentence under section 302 (11) under s…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 1969 SCMR 7
Article 62 and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, AXXVI Review The High Court has taken into consideration all the cases, relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in respect of all the courts. Land…
- MEHR ALI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 9
Article 62 and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, AXXVI Review The fact that one of the judges disagreed with the majority's opinion has given the verdict has no basis for review.…
- FEROZE DIN v. ALLAH DITTA 1969 SCMR 10
Article 62 and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, A XXVI Review cannot be given for any good reason only pursuant to those described in O XLVII, r 1, CPC Light Mistake (Matters for Decision Making). Fo…
- MUHAMMAD GHAFFAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 12
Article (58 ()) at the time of the hearing of the plea for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court does not usually take into account all the evidence, nor does it enter into questions of the def…
- GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTANAND ANOTHER v. BEGUM AGHA: ABDULKARIM SHORISH KASHMIRI 1969 PLD 14
The Defense of Pakistan Ordinance 1965 Section 3 (2) (X) [as amended by the Defense of Pakistan (Amendment Ordinance (II of 1968)]], amending section C (X) of section 3 (2), held. In the case of Ghula…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM. KHAN v. ATTA MUHAMMAD 1969 SCMR 16
Article fact fact The finding by the tribunals below cannot be bothered unless the High Court, without any evidence, justifies the finding in the jurisdiction of the writ, Denied a special leave to ap…
- BHULLAH v. KARIM BAKHSH 1969 SCMR 18
Article 62 reviews cannot be approved for consideration of fresh evidence that can be submitted to the court at the time of the original upbringing, with immediate effect.…
- MUHAMMAD RAHIM v. KAJEERULLAH 1969 PCRLJ 18
Sections 302 and 326 were struck with a knife in the abdomen, medical evidence could not clarify whether the injury conviction resulted in peritonitis, which the High Court correctly corrected under S…
- MUHAMMAD HAYAT & CO. v. BHALWAL CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD 1969 SCMR 19
O XLI, r: 27 Production of additional evidence in the Court of Appeal whether additional evidence may be admitted to make good evidence in evidence. Special leave of appeal by the Supreme Court:…
- ALI NAWAZ v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE 1969 SCMR 21
25 Adjustment to the Stability Scheme The individual, a minor power of attorney (to represent him in the stabilization process) does not sign the guardian ad duly designated, even if he or she takes a…
- MALIK DIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 22
Article 62 and Supreme Court Rules, 1956, while reviewing the AXXYI Supreme Court, passed the previous order not to be mistaken in its decision in any way, the High Court review was not erroneously de…
- MUHAMMAD HASHIM v. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR 1969 SCMR 24
Shadow, deputy custodian of Part I, AQUE Property Transfer, refuses to confirm a property transfer agreement in favor of an Araquanian property, however, accepting the exchange and saying that a lawsu…
- FATEH MUHAMMAD v. KARAM ILAHI 1969 SCMR 25
Article 58 (3) and the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the Special Court of Appeal against the plaintiff's breach by the Section 302 High Court, denied the grounds where grounds for appreciating th…
- M. A. RAHMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 27
r 1 Application bar with time restriction that the petitioner is awaiting a decision in such case: no room for delay.…
- ARSHAD BEGUM v. IJAZ A. MAHMOOD 1969 SCMR 27
Section 12 instructions given by the High Court that the mother should be made available to the juvenile at certain intervals to meet her father, whether such instructions should be considered by sect…
- TANWEER ABBAS v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 1969 SCMR 28
Article 62 and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, AXXVI Review Request Restricted…
- BABOO KHAN v. MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, MURREE 1969 SCMR 29
O VI, r 17 Amendment, Amendment of Application, At the second appeal stage, an entirely new case was tried on which no evidence was presented and the parties have never been involved in the matter at …
- LAL BAHA v. ABDUL SAMAD 1969 SCMR 31
Article 302 and Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 561A whether the High Court was justified in stopping proceedings under Section 302, PPC's special leave of appeal by the Supreme Court to c…
- FATEH BEGUM v. HAKIM ALI 1969 SCMR 32
Section 2: An order of dissolution of a marriage on the basis of cruelty, non-payment of rehabilitation and non-marital obligations, the order of rehabilitation by the wife has not been obtained under…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. JAFFERI BEGUM 1969 SCMR 34
Schedule, Part I and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 JM does not claim transfer of house which has been claimed in favor of JE in writ of transfer of jurisdiction, as a public court. The l…
- ABDUL GHAFFAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 37
Section 307 Alibi, hearing the appeal filed against the High Court, dismissed the appeal and failed to consider the three witnesses' supported alibi application.…
- MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. ABDUL GHAFAR 1969 SCMR 37
S 476 An application under section 50 to prosecute a person for perjury is whether a person can be successfully prosecuted on the merits of a lawsuit, suspected to be an action under section 476. Can …
- M. M. MANSUR ALI v. ARODHENDU SHEKHAR CHATTERJEE 1969 PLD 37
Civil Code 1908 Section 83 (2) and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 30 (1) The question is, in the present case, when it was announced on September 6, 1965 that Pakistan was at war with India …
- AKBAR ZAMAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 40
Appeal for special leave of appeal against section 302 conviction denied on the question of proof of proof only, Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3)…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 41
Special leave application for appeal to the Supreme Court against the section 302 conviction…
- SHAKHAWAT ULLAH KAZI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 42
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 147 and 431 under Section 144, CRPC continued proceedings under Section 144, CRPC and after issuing summons to the accused on charges of Section 144 and 431, P. The PC…
- DR. KAMAL HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD SIRAJUL ISLAM 1969 PLD 42
Sections 5, 6 and 20 and Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1966, r 3 presided over the selection of provincial bar council members and examined the nomination papers of the person described …
- KHAN ALI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 42
Section 4 High Court witnessing the accused acquitted: In this case, the accused filed a baseless case against the accused.…
- IN RE: v. KARAMAT ULLAH 1969 SCMR 43
Article 123 The Court of Persons may send various petitions to the Court and address personal letters to judges, where such acts of contempt of court may be practiced in the country directly under the…
- ALI MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 1969 SCMR 46
Sections 110 and 119 (2) were appealed under section 119 and the appeal was finalized and could not be questioned in any court, but the provincial government was, in its capacity, controller under sec…
- SHEIKH COTTON FACTORY v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN. 1969 SCMR 48
Seventh Twelfth, r 1 Explanation of time restriction by request: that the applicant was out of the station on business inclination is not sufficient to delay the concession…
- MUHAMMAD MOHSIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 49
On the report of the section 497 Murder Case Medical Board, the High Court rejected the request for special leave of appeal against the order of cancellation of bail by the High Court in which the acc…
- COLONY SARHAD TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED v. COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE & LAND CUSTOMS 1969 SCMR 50
Section 3 (1) and Schedule 1, Item, No. 15 A defined processed clothing as well as unprocessed clothing, both at one stage in the unclassified stage and the other at the next stage on the cotton fabri…
- KHUDA BAKHSH v. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD 1969 SCMR 51
[As amending the Ordinance (III of 1962) of the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) (Amendment) Ordinance (III of 1962), Section 10 questions whether section amendments cannot affect pe…
- RIASAT ALI v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD ETC. 1969 PCRLJ 53
Section 302 and Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), S 497 Guaranteed Guarantee The High Court's order issued by the Supreme Court to consider whether the High Court exercised judicial and reasonable di…
- S. M. JAFFAR v. A. Q. SHAUKAT 1969 PLD 53
The Criminal Code (CCPC) reads with Section 145 and the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (sections XXVIII of 1958), Sections 25, 3, 7 and 29 of the section on whether to evict a prop…
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. RAHIM BAKHSH 1969 SCMR 56
The question of interpretation of Article 6, read with Articles 6, Fundamental Rights No. 13 and 14 Fundamental Rights No. 13 and 14, special leave of appeal by the Supreme Court.…
- ZAMIRUDDIN AHMAD v. HAVAS KHAN 1969 PLD 57
Courts of Reconciliation Ordinance, 1961 Section 3 (1) (a) Read with Sec, Part I, Section B, Expression Expression Suit for Oral Recovery Due to Contracts in Section B, Section Part 1 of Section B Con…
- SALMAN NIZAMI v. STANDARD BANK LIMITED 1969 SCMR 57
r 1 The question is whether the rules governing the injunction under OXXIX, r 1 also apply to the establishment of the execution under the provisions of OXXI, r 29 to consider the question by the Supr…
- THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN COMMUNICARION v. GULZAR MUHAMMAD 1969 PLD 58
Pakistan's Constitution 1962 Article 58 Appeals to the Supreme Court After directing the Supreme Court to remand additional evidence with the High Court on remand, the opposition will be allowed to ha…
- ZAFAR SARWAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 59
Sections 173 and 190 (1) of the police are submitting an incomplete report under section 173 and show the accused to be in column 1 but in the final challan submitted the accused's name was entered in…
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 63
The Schedule, Part 1 CH form was rejected by the Settlement Authorities for the transfer of the premises on the ground that the applicant was not in the possession of the High Court, who did not repea…
- ALLAH BAKHSH v. STATE 1969 SCMR 65
Section 497 bail consistently denied by the High Court: Inquiry before the court is almost complete before the court is imposed, in which case the Supreme Court has also refused.…
- H. M. SAYA & CO., KARACHI v. WAZIR ALI INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI 1969 PLD 65
The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Sections 96 and 104 is authorized to file an appeal pursuant to a stranger or if it adversely affects the order approved in such case.…
- ABDUR RAHIM v. ABDUL AZIZ 1969 SCMR 68
Section 16 (b), to the extent and to what extent the partner, without the consent of its other partners, cannot compete with any other business of the same nature with which the firm with which it is …
- ATTA MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 69
Section 2 302/1499 Statements of witnesses that contain interchangeable features of this case…
- MUREED HUSSAIN v. HASSAN DIN 1969 PCRLJ 70
The appeal was denied by section 301 of the Supreme Court Panel Code (XLV of 1860).…
- S. M. JAFFAR v. A. Q. SHAUKAT AND ANOTHER 1969 PLD 70
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 Read with Supreme Court Rules, 1956, r 32 Appeal to the Supreme Court lawyer and lawyer after appearing in court and accepting a brief restriction of support a…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. KHAN MUHAMMAD SABAR LAL 1969 PLD 71
Whether the notice presented to a minor in possession of premises under section 30, section 308, section 308 of the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, may be deemed to be a valid noti…
- Khawaja MAHMUD SADIQ v. Mst. KHALIDA SHAFQAT KHANAM 1969 PCRLJ 72
Changing the circumstances of the parties in alteration of Articles 8488 and 9489 of the Code of Criminal Procedure increases the salary of the husband and increases the allowance for aging with more …
- MAHBOOB TRANSPORT LTD. v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 72
Arts (58 ()) and Special Appeal for special leave appeal for review dismissed the request for review because a similar request from another party was accepted and therefore dismissed. Ordered to: admi…
- Kh. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 73
Under the Pakistan Penal Code Section 124 Section 124A, Criminal Code (V 1898), read with Sections 196 and 257, the provincial government signs a complaint order from the PPC Home Secretary, on behalf…
- HAKAM DIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 73
Cases under sections 452, 323 and 325, sections 452, 323 and 325, were acquitted under section 452 but punishable under sections 323 and 325, which is bad on the charge under section 452, in the circu…
- ALLAH WASAYA v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 74
Sections 302 and 300, exception 1 murder the accused on the way to his house having illicit relations with his female relative.…
- KARAMATULLAH KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 74
Article 62 and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, AXXVI Review Complaint that the Government is not willing to implement the decision of the Supreme Court and the applicant, therefore, it asserts that …
- AHMAD DIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 75
Section 302 and Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 288 and 337 Applicable Questions Whether any sentence can be based on evidence of sanction, special leave appealed by the Supreme Court to c…
- MALI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 76
Article 58 (3) and the Supreme F Curt Rules. 1956, AXXIV r 2 Arch application for special appeal against special conviction escapes without authorization; The application is incomplete, incomplete and…
- S. M. YOUSUF v. S. K. RAHIM 1969 PLD 77
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 read with Article 123 of the contempt of court Act (XII of 1926), the jurisdiction to act in contempt of the powers of section 3 high courts, to be protected by immor…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. STATE 1969 SCMR 78
Section 497 and the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 307 find that the conviction of the High Court by the accused against the High Court is under the provisions of Sections 323 and 324, PPC, bu…
- PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN v. MESSERS MISTRI PATEL & CO. 1969 PLD 80
Section 74 of the Contract Act, 1874, the balance owed, the actual amount recovered for the forfeiture or forfeiture of the contract, or the amount recoverable upon failure to perform the contract if …
- GHULAM FARID v. STATE 1969 SCMR 80
Section 7 497 and trial 498 The determination of the defendant's conviction for a court trial is sufficient to establish the defendant's bail.…
- BAHAR KHAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 81
The release of offenders is pending on Section 6 426 bail…
- MUHAMMAD KHAN v. SULTAN 1969 SCMR 82
Article (58 ()) and the Supreme Court Rules, 6, 66 OX X, r 1 appeal for special leave against the order of acquittal under the ban with time restriction is not waived until then. Unless it is shown th…
- MALIK MAHMOOD v. STATE 1969 SCMR 83
An application to be banned under Article 58 (3) and Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O, XIII, r 1, in which the lawyer gave false advice about the limitation period, nor the name of the lawyer was disclose…
- SHAH PASAND KHAN v. COMMISSIONER, PESHAWAR 1969 SCMR 84
Whether the Commissioner is entitled to issue a person's property notification under special leave to appeal to the High Court under the person's property.…
- AKHTAR ZAHOOR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 87
In lower bail, the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 379 and 411 denied the allegations that the copper wire was alleged to have been stolen with no identifying marks and the accused had bought the wire. A…
- ABDUL HAMID v. FAZAL DIN 1969 SCMR 88
Article 3 58 () Application for Special Leave for Appeal Demands below the first record to deal with the requests required to inspect certain documents on the court record…
- GUL HASSAN v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 89
Sections 366 (2), 374, 422 and 423 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) should be lodged in an individual case whereby the relevant person appeals to the court in the process of justice before claimi…
- REHMAN SHAH v. MUHAMMAD SHAH 1969 SCMR 93
Section 100 Finding facts together through the following courts…
- FEROZ SHAH v. MANZOOR HUSSAIN 1969 SCMR 96
Appeal under Article 58 (3) CL 10, Letter Patent (Lahore) authorized but filed immediately by the Applicants, the application for appeal of special leave was not filed and the petitioner was returned.…
- MST. RAMZAN BIBI v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND TRIBUNAL,SAHIWAL 1969 PLD 97
The West Pakistan Control of Gondas Ordinance 1959 is of the opinion that the ordinance was listed on the peer list of the Constitution of Pakistan (1956) and some existing rules were rejected, withou…
- ALLAH DIWAYA v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 98
Constitution Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) Appeal for special leave appeal cannot be different from the appeal in the ordinary course that the High Court used as a routine complaint using discretion in…
- BHAI KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 101
Constitution Pakistan 1962 Article 58 and Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 302, the number of persons sentenced to death under 302 PPC while some were acquitted The High Court first affirmed the deat…
- GHULAM FATIMA v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 106
Article 58 (3) Special leave of appeal was not taken at any stage under the petitions sought for appeal before the courts refused leave.…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 108
Article 110 and 120 and the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 250 persons were sentenced by the Special Military Court on 4 6 62 but the order of punishment and punishment was not issued in acc…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. ABDUL MAJID 1969 SCMR 112
Article (3 ()) Refer to the Applicant's Appeal for Letter Patent Appeal Yet the Applicant applied for a special leave appeal under Article (3 ()) directly in the Supreme Court, held, premature and ord…
- FAZALUR REHMAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 113
Section 498 High Court dismisses bail plea by petition: No basis for bail was dropped…
- ABDUL JABBAR v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 114
Article 2 (12) The words contained within the premises of industrial concern must mean that they are actually located within the premises that are used as industrial concerns not to be used as separat…
- MUHAMMAD HANIF v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 116
Section 10 Section 10 Read with Section R01 Words of 1960 No. 824 Words The Chief Settlement Commissioner cannot transfer in his name any entitled property created in favor of the informant.…
- MUHAMMAD IDRISH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 116
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 123 The contempt of court violates the High Court's interim order passed by the court, which, therefore, has the right to decide whether or not the High Court ord…
- GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. HAJI MUHAMMAD 1969 SCMR 117
Article 178 Whether or not an employee of any employee (financial) is eligible for employment termination under section 178 which is related to the civil service.…
- SARWAR v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 118
Accused under Article 58 Section 302 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962, the PPC upholds the death sentence of A on the High Court of Appeal and Revision and transport to life imprisonment in connec…
- NISHAT AHMAD KHAN v. RAMLAH ZAKARIA 1969 SCMR 118
Article read with dissolution of Muslim marriage in section read Family Court has stated that dissolution of marriage has caused severe dislike to her husband and in such circumstances she will be for…
- AKBAR v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 119
SH, Part II and Settlement Scheme No. 1, Para 22 Property Appraisal Whether any other entity other than the Settlement Authorities capable of estimating the costs, appeals to the Supreme Court to cons…
- MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. ABDUR REHMAN 1969 SCMR 120
Article (58 (to) appeal for special leave of appeal) cannot be used as a metaphor for speedy decision by a subordinate court.…
- BAQIR HASAN v. NOOR-UD-DIN 1969 SCMR 121
Section 92 and OIX, r 9 suit whereby a suit can be set up by several persons after the institution of the Advocate General, in the event of a motion by one of the plaintiff's suit, already excluded. C…
- BAQIR HASAN v. NOOR-UD-DIN 1969 SCMR 122
Article 98 could not be authorized to write in breach of contract…
- SHAH NAWAZ KHAN v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NORTH ZONE WEST PAKISTAN LAHORE 1969 SCMR 123
Sections 66 (2) and 26 Income Tax Officer denied registration under section 26 which stated that the partnership deed was the contents of a document which was factual or not, if sought on the basis of…
- AHMAD KHAN v. CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY 1969 PLD 123
The State Duty Act 1950 section 38 is an estimate of cultivated and cultivated land of 17,922 production index units whose total production units cost, the main purpose of state duty, Rs. 10 per unit.…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. ASSISTANT REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 125
Article 98 The first application is excluded on the basis of privileges granted on the appropriate instruction; the second application on the basis that the applicant's special counsel has provided fr…
- HABIBULLAH v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 127
Evidence Act 1872 Section 157 The significant factor of the time or expression expressed in this regard was given approximately half an hour after the incident, which is clearly untrue [Hamood-ur-Rehm…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.