Supreme Court — Judgments of 1968
338 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1968 — page 1 of 4.
- MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 1
()) / ated Date of 19th May 1945 as Resolution read on 22nd November 1945 with Sindh Civil Services Classification and Recruitment Rules, 1952. Salary Rules, Sindh Civil Services Revised in 1953; Gove…
- EAST & WEST STEAMSHIP CO. v. HOSSAIN BROTHERS 1968 PLD 15
Section 151 Ship Owners The agreement to ship goods by ships does not deprive liability unless the cats are handed over to the shipment, resulting in the negligence on the part of the shipowners. Resu…
- MOOSA v. MUHAMMAD 1968 PLD 25
Article (58 ()) allows appeals by the Supreme Court so that in relation to third parties, their statements in claims or notices that concern the general public's importance to the stability of lawyers…
- THE PAKISTAN BIBLE SOCIETY v. ZAHID HUSSAIN 1968 PCRLJ 36
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 3 sentence sentence The Supreme Court approved the appeal of the appeal to consider whether the lower appellate court changed the sentence and reduced the sente…
- DAUD KHAN v. AURANGZEB 1968 PLD 54
In favor of a relationship within a prominent degree, Mian Law refuses to withdraw Gift's belief in Quds Gift…
- ZAFARULLAH KHAN v. HUSSAIN BIBI 1968 PLD 61
Special leave application for the Supreme Court of Pakistan Rules, 1956, O XIII, 1 1 Appeal The High Court's Single Judge refused to justify his decision under the letter patent limit, 60 days from th…
- PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN v. AMRITSAR-PATHANKOT TRANSPORT CO., LTD. 1968 PLD 64
The Motor Vehicles Act (I39 of 1939), section 43 (4) (a) read with the Government of India Act, 1935, section 299 (1), (2) of subsection (4) (a) of section 43 of Act IV of 1939 ? Such matters as the a…
- SUFIA KHATUN v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT 1968 PLD 72
Part of the acquisition of the plot read with section (()) did not run out of bounds or else the government is dependent on the scheme whose official land and building of East Bengal has long since be…
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. HATEM ALI 1968 PLD 78
The Wright mandamus order created under the Act may be canceled by the court if it is satisfied that such order was not in the actor's discretion that the interests of the applicants were not complied…
- CENTRAL EXCHANGE BANK LTD. v. ZATTOON BEGUM 1968 PLD 83
Section 126 Fixed Deposit Receipt in the name of wife submitted by husband as security in connection with his own drafts by the security bank Such receipts as security in case of his draft from the ba…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1968 PLD 96
Denying all witnesses to support prosecution case after being convicted of Section 302 murder…
- MUHAMMAD YUSAF v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1968 PLD 101
Article 2 By enacting legislation to enjoy the protection of law and to act according to the law, Pakistan is not construed as providing basic rights and granting basic rights to citizens or individua…
- NASEEM JAHAN NAIM v. GENERAL MANAGER, P. W. R. 1968 PLD 112
Article 179 (2), read with Art 177 (l) (b) and 234, and a temporary employee of the Government of India Act 1935 Section 240 (3) Railway, were appointed for permanent post in 1955, Such employee's cas…
- A. R. NIAZI v. PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 119
Sections 3 and 16A (unmodified and amended) trust were sold to the State Real Estate Bank of Pakistan State Bank of Pakistan. Scheme for the management of trust properties developed by the Chief Settl…
- ABDUL GHANI v. SHOEDAR KHAN CO. 1968 PLD 131
The provisions of Sections 8, 20 and 60 of Sections 8 and 20 do not give the Deputy Commissioner any power to try and determine the suit so the summons issued under OV, R1, C1C, in the first schedule.…
- ABDULLAH v. ABDUL KARIM 1968 PLD 140
Sections 4 and 15 (c), thirdly the sale is partially in favor of the secrets of the estate and partially the sale of the sale to strangers in respect of the shares of several vendors recognized by the…
- GHULAM FATIMA v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LAND) 1968 PLD 147
Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX811 of 1958), Section 10D! S, Para 4 Settlement Scheme No. V and Central Government Press Notes Reading 7 60 60 and 28 7 60 Para 4 Off Schedule An…
- ABDUL MAJID v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1968 PLD 154
SH, Part 11 Shop Question whether the claimant in possession of two separate business units may choose to select either of the two after submitting his C-section form for the transfer of special leave…
- AMIR-UD-DIN v. CLAIMS COMMISSIONER, PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 165
Section 7 (3) claims registration (IDPs) rules are read in accordance with 1955, the claim commissioner may be used at any time under r 6 (2A), however, before his or her conscious mind To apply the f…
- HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 167
Section 302/34 Two of the four accused were convicted and sentenced to death. One of the High Courts is confirmed, but the other was allowed to consider special leave of appeal for reduction of life i…
- AHMAD KHAN v. CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT, WEST PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 171
, Articles 98 read with Articles 101, 131 and 132 which are applicable to the writ petition. The High Court has amended the rule port and made it from the High Court to Rs 100, which is CL 27, Letters…
- SHAHZADA v. HAMIDULLAH ALIAS LELAI,THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 176
Under Section 302 and 304, the offenders under Section 302 and 304 should be allowed to consider whether to approve the appeal by the High Court whether the facts and circumstances adhered to the corr…
- TANBIR AHMAD SIDDIKY v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 185
Section 3 and 44 notification for acquisition of rent-earning interests by the Provincial Government have been declared invalid by the decision of Jabinder Kishor, Province of East Pakistan. PLD 1957 …
- KELA v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 185
The High Court, while refusing to grant bail, denied the bail and denied that bail was not exercised properly, in such cases allowed to appeal under bail, Criminal Code of Conduct (V9) 1898), Article …
- GHULAM NAB v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 186
The allegations of crimes under Sections 302/32 and 201/452 denied the plea of the Albany High Court prior to the pre-arrest bail that the test of the petition was a factual question for the trial cou…
- JALAL DIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 187
Pakistan Penal Code Section Ins 84 The burden of insanity is the crucial point at which a baseless mentality must be established when a crime is proved to be deserving of immunity when the crime is pr…
- JALAL DIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 188
Without giving any valid reason for supporting the order, the sessions court granted such order by the High Court, based on the court's exercise of leave, to appeal the bail plea of Pakistan (1962). A…
- NAZIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 1968 PCRLJ 190
Release of bail before Section 498 bail, leave of appeal against the High Court order…
- A. HAMID v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 192
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 The reason for bail is that the common grounds of the seriousness of smuggling, etc., should not be allowed to prevail against the general rule unless the d…
- HAJI WALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 194
Section 504, read under Pakistan Penal Code Section 304, Part I Section 504, is entitled to appeal under the right of private defense, the Extent, where the High Court charged the accused with exceedi…
- AHMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 195
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 29B allows for special leave appeals for the commission of jurisdictions to consider whether the High Court's interpretation generally empowers all magistrates.…
- MUHAMMAD MALIK PERVEZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 196
Treatment of misconduct by reviewing bail bail cancellation orders before section 498 of the Criminal Code (CCPC)…
- THE STATE v. MUHAMMAD YOUSUF 1968 PCRLJ 197
Article 302 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962, Article 58 (3), for a 2-day ban, is a matter under the Constitutional Code, delayed concession.…
- MUHAMMAD MALIK PERVEZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 199
Special leave was granted for the appeal of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) where it was held that the High Court had stopped considering the relevant evidence on record.…
- MUHAMMAD AMIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 201
Section 302 read with section 300, exception 4 The accused and the victim (middle school students) used to quarrel and seize the game but were separated by the accused, threatening to take revenge on …
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. INAYAT 1968 PCRLJ 205
Pakistan Panel Code Section 100 Private defense, right of the complaining party, lifting sticks, wounded in large numbers, group of grieving and engaged accused heavily armed with hatchets and dings, …
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 209
Appeal for leave of appeal with the advice of the applicant that its remedy is to approach the competent Court against the order of the trial court and not the request of the Supreme Court to revise t…
- ABDUL KHALIQ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 210
The Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3) appealed the conviction because of suspicion of the need for further examination.…
- CHOUDHARY FEROZE DIN v. M. JAVID, ADVOCATE,M. YAKUB 1968 PCRLJ 212
The High Court dismissed the applicants' appeal against conviction under Articles 420 and 468, a leave of appeal for the PPC prosecutor's plea that once a criminal appeal be admitted, It cannot be rul…
- AHMAD DIN v. RASUL BIBI 1968 PLD 213
Article 58 (3) read with the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O 12th r 1 The request for appeal to the Supreme Court has been delayed by the sixty-day deadline, explaining the delay of each day. The Certifi…
- KARAMAT HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 213
Delays, condolences of a petitioner who has filed a jail sentence from time to time, in relation to the delay of this day's ban on the request of other applicants in the Pakistan Constitution (1962), …
- MUHAMMAD ASHIQ FAQIR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 215
Under Section 182 and 193, PPC of the Registrar High Court, a complaint was filed against the Chief Justice High Court for refusing to stop the proceedings by the Civil Judge High Court. Yes, the requ…
- LAKSHMI INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. NAWA-I-WAQT PUBLICATIONS LTD. 1968 PLD 215
Section A 43 has been studied with the addition of section with read A, the custodian declaration regarding vacant property status has been deemed necessary by the irregularities, and the High Court h…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF ALIAS SHARIFI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 216
The one-day ban was delayed because of the delay in the ban because it merely praised the evidence in the petitions as the death sentence involved in the case.…
- ABDUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 217
Article 302 The accused in the deepest words negotiated between the deceased and his uncle Signed Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3) for the special leave intention to kill the petition for a special lea…
- MUHAMMAD DAUD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 218
Under Criminal Code (CRPC) Sections 154, Sections 376 and 452, the first information report crime was registered by the husband on the return of duty in Syria that same day, in the absence of her husb…
- ZAMIR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 219
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 526 Transfer of a Criminal Case The High Court refuses to transfer the case from one court to another, with the exception of such an order, the High Court, to b…
- SAEED AHMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 220
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 526 The transfer of a magistrate from one magistrate to another is rejected by the High Court, which will appeal against the order of the High Court, whereby the…
- MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 221
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 288 Enemy Witnesses Reviewed Evidence Defending a Prosecutor's Witness Court In Support of the Story of the Prosecutor, but Defending the Prosecution Under Sect…
- MUHAMMAD ABDUL JALIL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 223
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Transfer of criminal cases pending in the Cord6 subordinate courts is within the discretion of the High Court. Such matters should generally be terminated there and spe…
- SHER MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 224
Bail bail in the Criminal Code (CCPC) Section 497 Murder Case…
- MANZOOR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 225
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 133 Public mob flour mill and cotton gin plant Working in crowded area causing great anxiety to neighbors…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 226
Background of enmity against a convicted applicant. The long delay in reporting seeks two contradictory clarifications and visible defects in the evidence of the prosecution, in these cases, requiring…
- MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. HAJI ALLAH BAKHSH 1968 PCRLJ 227
The Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3) requires re-examination of the evidence to ensure a safe delivery of justice.…
- GHULAM NABI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 228
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 6 426 and A 56? E bail bonds look for extension of bail to the appellant convicted by the High Court and subsequently to increase the penalty for canceling such…
- ASHFAQ-UR-RAHMAN v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 1968 PLD 230
Sections 13 (6) and 17 rent control cannot instruct the tenant to submit a timely restricted rent expression. All rent due ordinances are to be construed with limited intention of collecting rent not …
- AMINUDDIN v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL, CHITTAGONG 1968 PLD 235
Section 10 and 58 read with Electoral College Rules, 1964, r 14 (4) electoral roll, except for admission to the binding of the Election Tribunal, in respect of legal disqualification, the Election Tri…
- TIKAMDAS v. ABDUL WALI 1968 PLD 241
(E) the Property Transfer Law (I82 of I82), the right to redeem section 60 mortgages should be exercised in one of the etiquette suggested by section 60, which alleges that in the previous case for O,…
- COMMISSIONER v. PARVEZ IQBAL 1968 PLD 259
Article (58 ()) leave for appeal granted by the Supreme Court because the full bench of the High Court had already been discharged, depending on which this court granted under Commissioner's Section (…
- STATE v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 1968 PLD 265
Sections 3, 10 (2), (4) were read with section 6 (5), and with the Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 7 41 High appeal to appeal from the acquittal by the High Court of Person. Application (C…
- MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE v. AKHTAR KHAN 1968 PLD 270
Section (60 ()) (b), with the words 71, ?6 and eighth, which are permissible under this Act in section (59 ()) (b), mean the speed within the limits set by the Act. Is not allowed to increase or decre…
- MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. STATE 1968 PLD 281
Section 1 561A (Inherent Powers of the High Court) (Establishing criminal proceedings under civil litigation is not a necessary rule to keep a criminal proceeding on the police challan. The issue of a…
- BYRAMJI D. MAMA v. ABDUL QADIR 1968 PLD 286
Section 12 (a) reads with the words in Sections 2, 4 and 5, or in section 12 (a) for any other reason the former words should be mentioned, as a general rule, such principle, however, Not applicable w…
- GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. KARAMATULLAH KHAN 1968 PLD 292
Rules, 1963, r 4, Constitution of Pakistan (1962), read with Arts 178 (3), 178 (4) (C), Replacing [Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act (11 of 1966)), 225, 234, 250 and the provisions (in continuation) …
- RASHID AHMAD v. BARKAT ALI 1968 PLD 301
r 22 (3) r 36 Reading the voter's name was added to the daily electoral rolls on which the provincial government issued a notification demanding that each of the electoral units be selected in the Ele…
- NADARA v. JAMAIT KHAN 1968 PLD 310
In case of death sentence or transportation for life in an offense read with Section 497 Section 210, bail is invalid that in such cases bail cannot be allowed except in the case of 497, the court sho…
- ABDUL BAQI BALUCH v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 313
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 98 (2) (b) (i) Defense Pakistan Rules, r 32 (1) (b) and Defense Pakistan Ordinance (XXIII of 1965), section 3 (2) (x) read with scope. With regard to the powers o…
- ABDUS SATTAR RANA v. S. M. ZAIDI 1968 PLD 331
Article (58 ()) Allow an appeal by the Supreme Court to consider the argument that the election results were not allegedly influenced by irregularities or mat exercise [Electoral College Rules, 1964, …
- NOOR MUHAMMAD v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1968 PLD 336
Article (58 ()) Leave for Appeal granted by the Supreme Court (after review of the first order denying leave) whether the Chief Settlement Commissioner approved the sale of a large mansion Is the appr…
- BEJOY RANJAN KANUNGO v. KHALILUR RAHMAN 1968 PLD 342
Under Section 108 (n) of the Trust Act (11 of 1882), Section 88 is the responsibility of the tenant to inform the landlord of the landlord's rights through any legal action or otherwise the landlord, …
- ABDUL MALIK v. STATE 1968 PLD 349
Sections 497 (1), (2) and 498 do not impede any order or decision of the Supreme Court in the case of bail, the basic necessary guarantee will never be withheld, at the discretion of the guarantor, wi…
- RIASAT ALI v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 1968 PLD 353
Section 497 Delay in trial on misuse of bail law in non-bailable offense, a reasonable basis for guaranteeing bail for the accused in the trial, however, should be weighed and decided in each case. ? …
- MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 357
Article 178 Government Employee Class El Officer is appointed to the rank of Class 1 in a temporary capacity on specific terms: (i) that the appointment shall be suspended at any time on one month's n…
- ABDUL QAYYUM v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1968 PLD 362
The property of SH, Parts I and V and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art 98 Iwaki, has declared a large mansion that the occupants of some part of such property are entitled to transfer it on the ba…
- BABAR ALI v. STATE 1968 PLD 372
After the Articles 147 and 316/149 riots, a large number of accused accused of seeking shelter in the house did not prove against two of them, they were arrested from home along with other accused. Th…
- CHALNA FIBRE COMPANY LTD. v. ABDUL JABBAR 1968 PLD 381
Under the jurisdiction of Section 9 and Companies Act (VII of 1913), Sections 3 and 24, the demand for a declaration by the managing director of a company is not immediately assessed: (i) that they ar…
- ASGHAR HUSSAIN v. ELECTION COMMISSION PAKISTAN 1968 PLD 387
Article 98 (2) (a) (i) read with Article 153 Article Election Commissioner, under Article 153, is performing the performance of the paragraph in relation to the fairs of the Election Commissioner, suc…
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. DAULATPUR JUTE MILLS LTD. 1968 PLD 398
Article (58 ()) to consider the special leave of appeal by the Supreme Court whether the High Court has properly interpreted the provisions of the Defense Pakistan Rules, 1965, and if the defense has …
- MUHAMMAD MAZHAR ALIAS ZUHRI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 401
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) abolishes an order for affiliation with Section 498 High Court Sessions, but under the order of the Sessions Judge, the magistrate accused the Sessions Judge of com…
- FATEH SHER v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 403
Pakistan Penal Code Section 323 In fact, one of the defense witnesses did not appear in the confession of the complainant and in fact, the reason why the matter should be reconsidered in any case. (3)…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 404
The Pakistan Penal Code section 300, exception 1 to the charge of grave and sudden outrage, prevents more passers-by from seeing more of the yard's allegations and preventing them from further proceed…
- GHULAM HAIDER v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 405
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 62 Supreme Court Point Decision There is no room for review by the court on the last occasion…
- MUHAMMAD TUFAIL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 406
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 1 561 A large amount of criminal cases cannot be deduced from the High Court's decision that the authority to suspend this process cannot be obtained by a Secti…
- MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 407
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 62 Review Points Appealed in Support of the Court's Factual Requests When a previous application was considered, no new point was settled, no case for review, was…
- SHER KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 408
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Bail Procedure for Cancellation of Bail, Extensive Legal Responsibility to Appear Personally…
- ABDUL HAMID v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 410
Section 302 murder accused for killing certain destinations while riding the train with the deceased, his grandfather, with relatives, did not plead with the deceased to go to the railway station, al-…
- MIAN FAKHR-I-ALAM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 411
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) granted bail in section 498 non-bailable offense allowed the Supreme Court to consider the question as to whether the High Court, in the course of the trial, was al…
- MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 412
Criminal Code under Section 395 (CCPC) Section 497 Guarantee Offense The PPC High Court has rejected bail for the reasons that the allegations against the applicant are serious and for bail after the …
- MUHAMMAD IDRISH v. EAST PAKISTAN TIMBER MERCHANTS GROUP 1968 PLD 412
Section 3 and the Trade Organization Ordinance (XLVof 1961), Article 12 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 provide no remedy for the Registrar of joint stock companies in the Companies Co…
- FAZAL DIN v. MUHAMMAD LATIF 1968 PCRLJ 413
Section 302 Applying for Special Leave Against Declaration of Bad Death in the Supreme Court Same Proof to Exhibit Stamps of the External Influence of the First and Third Death Declarations, Against A…
- MST. UMMAL BANO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 416
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 301 murder alleges that he managed to hold Dhatura after robbery with his four friends (after his return from robbery cases). Killed him with a hatchet and buried his b…
- UMRA KHAN v. KHALID MAHMUD 1968 PCRLJ 417
Under Section 411, the accused have been charged with claiming that they did not claim to have the property recovered from it, nor are they offering any explanation that they should own the property i…
- ABDULLAH ALIAS DULLA v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 418
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Appeal pending bail pleads to the Supreme Court Grounds that if requested in support of a request for bail, it will move to a breach of appeal.…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 419
Section 406 of the Pakistan Penal Code read with the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), the criminal breach of Section 5 trust is the fact that the prosecution's witness stated in the case (3 …
- MEHRAJ DIN v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 1968 PCRLJ 425
Appeal to Special Court for sentencing under sections 4 and 5 under sections 4 and 5 of the West Pakistan Prevention Gambling Ordinance 1961…
- IQBAL AHMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 428
Appellants of Criminal Code (CCPC) Sections 416 and 498 bail were found to be equipped with a rifle and a complainant who was targeted by appellant B&C, the accused of the bullet company in which the …
- KHAN BAHADUR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 429
Section 302 is neither invoiced by the police nor has the magistrate complained in the sessions of the complainant and in the High Courts that the order has been ordered that the person seeking the fa…
- SALEEM KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 430
Pakistan Penal Code Section 300, Exception 1 Murder grave and sudden outrage were alleged that the panchayat denied killing his wife. Conduct of full and fiery claims of aggression…
- MEHRAJ DIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 435
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 9 Cri9 Criminal Revision, challenging the prosecution of the accused on one count, appeals to the defendants against their conviction on other charges, as well …
- MUHAMMAD DAUD v. FAZAL ELAHI 1968 PCRLJ 436
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 498 Bail The High Court acquitted two suspects in connection with firing and seriously injuring witnesses by firing in the air and granting bail to the complain…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.