Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ZAHOOR AHMAD versus ABDUL AZIZ


Exemption cannot be obtained before the High Court in the writ jurisdiction of the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Schedule I, Division I, to the ability of the house to settle.

1970 S C M R 88

Present : S. A. Rahman and Fazle‑Akbar, .JJ

ZAHOOR AHMAD‑Petitioner

versus

ABDUL AZIZ AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 275 of 1967, decided on 11th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 16th May 1967, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 900 of 1967).

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958),

Sched., Part I‑Division of house‑Within com petence of Settlement Authorities‑Exception cannot be taken before High Court in writ jurisdiction.

Muhammad Idrees, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo .for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 11th October 1967.

JUDGMENT

S. A. RAHMAN, J.‑

The petitioner was in possession of a shop in a composite property and this was transferred to him by the Settlement authorities. He wanted another portion of the premises not in his possession, to be transferred to him instead of Abdul Aziz, respondent. This prayer was not acceded to by the Settle ment authorities in their final order, and the petitioner sought redress against that order in the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. He was not successful and seeks special leave to appeal.

The order passed by the Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner in final revision, divided the property into three independent units and transferred them to the persons in posses sion. The respondent Abdul Aziz, though a local, was held entitled to transfer of one portion which was declared an indepen dent house, as its valuation was less than Rs. 10,000. This was an order within the jurisdiction of the Settlement and Rehabilita tion Commissioner's powers and no exception could have been taken to it in writ jurisdiction. After hearing Mr. Muhammad Idrees, in support of the petition, we are not persuaded that any case for interference with the departmental authorities order has been made out.

The petition is dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.