Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1967, decided on 9th October 1967.
O. XIX-Concise statement Attorney intimating Court that neither counsel nor client prepared to co‑operate in filing concise statement‑Show‑cause notices issued by Supreme Court to both.
Z. A. Qureshi, Attorney Supreme Court of Pakistan for Appellant.
Tanvir Ahmad, Attorney Supreme Court of Pakistan for Respondent.
Date of hearing : 9th October 1967.
Qureshi,
Attorney in this case, appears without his Counsel. Shaikh Mahboob Elahi, and puts in petition for withdrawal from the case on the ground that neither his Counsel nor the client have co‑operated with him in getting the concise statement prepared. Let a notice issue to the appellant personally to show cause why the leave granted should not be rescinded and his petition dismissed for no prosecution. Counsel should also be notified to appear and explain why he has not been able to prepare the concise statement in spite of several adjournments granted in the case. The stay order previously granted by this Court is hereby vacated.
Order accordingly.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer