Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MANGLI versus SUHAGI


The Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 was dismissed on civil merit, not on merit, on the basis that civil courts have no jurisdiction. The passerby has already been agitated by the issue. The special appeal granted by the Supreme Court to consider the question was unsuccessful.

1970 S C M R 69

Present : A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and S. A. Rahman, J

MANGLI‑Petitioner

versus

Mst. SUHAGI AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 382 of 1967, decided on 25th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 27th July 1967, in Writ Petition No. 634/R of 1967).

Constitution of Pakistan (1962),

Art. 98‑Civil suit dismissed not on merits but on ground that civil Courts had no jurisdiction Question whether High Court in circumstance justified in refusing to entertain writ petition on ground that petitioner had previously agitated the matter byway of suit and had failed‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.

Gul Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdur Razzaq Raja, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 25th October 1967.

ORDER

S. A. RAHMAN, J.

‑Leave to appeal is granted in this case to consider the contention raised on behalf of Mangla the petitioner, that the High Court committed an error in rejecting the petition for a writ, merely on the ground that the petitioner had previously agitated the matter by way of a suit, and had failed in that suit right up to the stage of second appeal in the High Court. It is pointed out by Mr. Gul Muhammad, on behalf of the petitioner, that the suit failed not on the merits, but on the ground that the civil Courts had no jurisdiction to decide the dispute. In the circumstances the learned Counsel contended with force, that the view that prevailed in the High Court that no writ petition could be entertained in the circumstances, was open to grave question.

The point is of general importance and merits consideration.

We grant leave to appeal as prayed. The petitioner will furnish security in the sum of Rs. 1,003 for costs prior to the appeal being set down for hearing.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Phool nagar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.