Supreme Court — Judgments of 1966
98 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1966.
- JAMAL SHAH v. ELECTION COMMISSION 1966 PLD 1
Article 98 (2) (a) (ii) (ii) and 171 (1) (2) (3) of the High Court under Article 98 this is under the Constitution that is, subject to bars bars. Is. , Among others, such jurisdiction in Article 171 h…
- PAKISTAN STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS ASSOCIATION v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN 1966 PLD 72
Minimum Wage Ordinance 1961 Section 5 directs the Board to recommend the minimum wage is the absence of the necessary conditions w the proper machinery for effective regulation of wages ??? Opinion on…
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. NAZIR AHMAD SHAH 1966 PLD 78
Constitution of Pakistan 1956 Article 181 Government Employer (Railway Employee), Removal from office by Assistant Inspector, Way & Works, (PWR) Divisional Engineer (Senior Scale Officer), as per Circ…
- BIBI AYESHA v. CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, WEST PAKISTAN 1966 PLD 84
The leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) is allowed to consider the questions whether appointed by the Chief Land Commissioner (West Pakistan Land R…
- NOOR HUSSAIN v. STATE 1966 PLD 88
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) waives permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, allowing it to consider whether [a complaint related to a complaint under section 167, C Customs Act …
- RASHID MURTAZA QURESHI v. STATE 1966 PLD 94
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 123 Interference of contempt of court, function in Chambers proceedings, contempt of court in contempt of court (XII of 1926), Section 2…
- MUHAMMAD AMIN DURRANI v. GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN 1966 PLD 99
Article 98 (3) (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 expressly Article 178 (2), (3) other than the words that I have served in this Constitution a term or service found in Article 98 (3) (b). Excep…
- A. K. FAZLUL QUADER CHAUDHURY v. SHAH NAWAZ 1966 PLD 105
Article 107 (a) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1962) - Letter of resignation of a member of the National Assembly, resignation of the Speaker to the President of Pakistan, instead of a Member of the…
- HAJIANI v. WEST PAKISTAN LAND COMMISSION 1966 PLD 114
Martial Law Regulation 1959 No. 64 [Martial Law Regulation (CMLA No s No. 64], read with the provisions of paragraphs 3, 4 (6) and 27 para 11 (1)), the Land Commission's Commission on Civil Disputes C…
- MUSHTAQ AHMED v. STATE 1966 PLD 126
Sections 497 (5) and 439 of the High Court Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC), the judge inspecting the court of the Additional District Magistrate, before instructing him to cancel the bond of the accus…
- GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. MUHAMMAD ALI 1966 PLD 132
Rules (force in sequence) Order 1958 Article 6 (3), (9) (A) (C) (D) Civil Services Rules (Punjab) Vol. I, R 328 and Civil Services Rules (Punjab) Vol. II, R.R. Read along with the 5 & 6 and 36 36 clau…
- M. H. KHONDKAR v. STATE 1966 PLD 140
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 123 contempt of court facing contempt of court in High Court or Supreme Court subordinate \ face prejudice of allegations and disqualification of hearing, two wri…
- SHAMIM v. STATE 1966 PLD 178
Section 200 reads with section 537 Failure to check the complainant before proceeding, may only be irrevocable under section 537, although the language of section 200 does not lead to an inevitable di…
- MUHAMMAD AZIM v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 1966 PLD 182
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance 1959 Section 13 (2) (i); (ii) (a) and (3) (a) (ii) (a) Civil Code Rule (V8 1908), O XXII, r 4 (1) Landlord's pending action for eviction by a legal representative…
- GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. A. A. AZIZ 1966 PLD 188
Appointment of specialists made after the implementation of section 8 (3) (b) of the Act of Providence (B) of the West Pakistan Act, 1955, although appropriate in broad terms. Order of the High Court …
- MUHAMMAD LATIF v. STATE 1966 PLD 201
Essential Commodities (Control of Distribution) Order 1953 1953, CL 3 (2) Agreement for the purchase of imported goods between the importer and any other party, unless such purchaser has full ownershi…
- JHAMANDAS v. CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER 1966 PLD 229
West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation, 1959 [Martial Law Regulation [CMLA] No. 64], paragraphs 3 and 27 read with paragraphs 9 and 11 and the (Continuation of Law) Order (IEEE 1958), Article 2 (4). , (…
- MUHAMMAD AZHAR v. COMMISSIONER OF KARACHI 1966 PLD 253
The West Pakistan Basic Democracy Department of Power Rules 1962 r 9 Development Officer, Basic Democracy (Karachi) should be issued by the Commissioner instead of the provincial government's notice, …
- MUHAMMADI OIL AND GENERAL MILLS,LYALLPUR v. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, \'A\' WARD,LYALLPUR 1966 PTD 255
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 44 Section 28 is read with expression Chapter IV in section 44 is responsible for review under assessment income The penalty for deliberately concealing details of income, …
- Sh. MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR-UL-HAQ-Appellant v. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 1966 PTD 259
The Income Tax Act 1922 was read with section 44 section 63 and the intention of the dissolved firm for super tax notices was presented to a partner, even if all the partners were responsible for the …
- NIHAL KHATOON v. ALLAH WASAI 1966 PLD 261
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) read with the Supreme Court of Pakistan Rules 1956, Seventh Twelfth, Special leave for appeal 1 shall be filed within 60 days from the date of appeal of de…
- GHULAM FARID v. THE STATE 1966 PLD 264
The Proof of Death 32, section 32 of the Evidence Act 1872, is made somewhere other than the police station and can often be dependable.…
- NAZEEF v. ABDUL GHAFFAR 1966 PLD 267
Read the Transfer of Property Act 1882 with sections 58 and 60 of the Transaction Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 148 seeking to recover the surplus charge from the mortgage and when the mortgage…
- MUMTAZ KHAN v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1966 PLD 276
CL 10 (Appeal from a High Court Judge's Decision) Art by a civil judge relating to a civil matter is presented as a decision under CL 10, such order The government is using the original jurisdiction i…
- GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN v. ROWSHAN BIJAYA SHAUKAT ALI KHAN 1966 PLD 286
The East Pakistan Public Safety Ordinance 1958 (LXXVIII of 1958), Section 41 reasonably questions the suspicion; whether or not the suspect is reasonable, Justice Boden lies on justifying the arrest b…
- USMAN v. HAJI OMER HAJI AYUB 1966 PLD 328
Section 4 of the Partnership Act 1932 reads with Section 69 Act does not provide a specific way to constitute a partnership. Validates Partnerships for Acquisition…
- FEROZE SHAH v. MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN 1966 PLD 340
(CMLA Regulation No. 64), read with paragraph 27 paragraph 16 (additional land to the government free from any obstruction or accusation) Both mortgage and mortgage declaration and nd surrender land, …
- MIR AHMAD NAWAZ KHAN v. SUPERINTENDENT JAIL, LYALLPUR 1966 PLD 357
Rules of the Military Court (Supplementary Orders) Ordinance 1962 S, 2, is a clause as to whether the ultra-virus commander has, so far, affected the orders of the Chief, and is it Article 2, the Cons…
- ABDUL REHMAN v. SETTLEMENT, REHABILITATION AND CLAIMS COMMISSIONER 1966 PLD 362
Claims of courts appointed under paragraph 4 (1) of the Martial Law Regulation 1959 No. 88 (Cmla) s No. 88, Para 1 [Amended by Martial Law Regulation (Cmla \ s Amendment No. 93]). Jurisdiction of the …
- MANZOOR JAHAN BEGUM v. HUSSAIN BAKHSH 1966 PLD 375
Civil Procedure for the issuance of CPC orders and orders read with Code XXI, RR 58 (2) and 66 section 11 and the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), mortgages from the sale of mortgaged property T…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL & CO. ETC. v. CHIEF COTTON INSPECTOR 1966 PLD 388
The West Punjab Cotton (Control) Act, 1949 Act (IV of 1949), Section 30 (P) of the Punjab Cotton (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1953 (I of 1954) have been amended. The purpose of the fee is to collect the…
- USMAN v. Haji OMER Haji AYUB, 1966 PTD 396
Section 4 of the Partnership Act 1932 reads with Section 69 Act does not provide a specific way to constitute a partnership. Validates Partnerships for Acquisition…
- RALLI BROTHERS LTD. v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1966 PLD 409
The East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948 (X111 of 1948), the section 3 acquisition order must specify and identify the specific portion of the property separately; Implementation order, order of …
- FAQIRA v. STATE 1966 PLD 413
Article 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) excludes a confession otherwise the confessional offense or admissible statement in the nature of admission to a person who is accidentally magistr…
- STATE 1966 PLD 419
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Arts 58 (2) (c), 58 (3) 123 Appeal to the Supreme Court is limited to the punishment imposed by the High Court in exercise of the powers under Article 58 (2) (c) Article …
- FEROZE KHAN v. GHULAM NABI KHAN 1966 PLD 424
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 9 Rev9 Amendment powers may be disturbed by the finding of facts, in appropriate cases, interference by the High Court cannot be limited to cases where the cour…
- STATE v. MUHAMMAD AKBAR 1966 PLD 432
Constitution Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) Appeal to the Supreme Court to ask the High Court order in the court to acquit the accused of murder, to the extent that there is power to arrest private pers…
- MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. KRISHAN LAL MALHOTRA 1966 PLD 439
The concept of fair rent under the Act is different from the standard rent prescribed under the previous Act under sections 4 and 8 of the Punjab Urban Registration Act, 1947 References which were irr…
- ZAINUL ABIDIN v. MULTAN CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. 1966 PLD 445
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) Appeals from Supreme Court against the High Court's order rejecting the writ of mandamus writ petition for restoration of the applicant (Cooperative Bank A…
- ABDUL BARN v. WEST PAKISTAN SOIL RECLAMATION BOARD 1966 PLD 451
Notification No. 317IRGWDI 50 VIII (1) / 57 59 under section 17, 18, 20, 21 and 46 of the Jaranwala Reclamation Scheme of the Punjab Soil Improvement Act, 1952, approved by the Government of Punjab We…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI- v. MESSRS SHABBIR & Co. 1966 PTD 453
Section 10 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1922 deducts the loss of ordinary business of the Assisi by robbery by the employee of the vehicle in which the Assisi's accountant was taking money in the customs…
- JAN MUHAMMAD v. ABDUL GHAFOOR 1966 PLD 461
Article (3 ()) Leave to appeal to the High Court (pre-trial suit) High court, dismissing the limited plaintiff's appeal on the basis that (i) the appeal was delayed by 244 days. (ii) this case was inv…
- SALAMAT BIBI v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, MULTAN 1966 PLD 467
The leave to appeal in the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) is allowed to consider whether the High Court justifies the dismissal of the appeal before the appearing of a lawyer before bein…
- SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS LTD. v. INDUSTRIAL COURT 1966 PLD 472
Petition for special leave to appeal under Article Pakistan 1956 Article 160 [Law (Continuing Study) Order (I of 1958), Article 2] and Articles Pakistan (1962), Arts 58 (3), 225 and 250 160, Constitut…
- STATE v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 1966 PLD 481
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) Appeal to the Supreme Court On the eve of the hearing of the Appeal State's leave, it can be held, dismissed, [by the High Court seeking timely leave to le…
- ABDUL HAFIZ v. REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1966 PLD 483
Pakistan Restoration Ordinance 1956 Section 11 (4) Section 7 (1) and Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Scheme (Punjab), Part 1, Para 23 and Part 7, Para 7 read with the Commissioner of Rehabilitation, its…
- AKBAR ALI v. RAZI-UR-RAHMAN 1966 PLD 492
The Electoral College Act 1964 has been read with section 45 section 40 and there is no contradiction between the provisions of section 45 and section 40 ballot paper, when there is no official mark, …
- BANNU WOOLLEN MILLS v. CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL COURT 1966 PLD 498
Decision between rights and responsibilities in the Industrial Disputes Ordinance 1959 Section 10 Industrial Court Court rights Jurisdictional powers that are not strictly limited to the limits of the…
- HABIBULLAH KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 1966 PLD 505
Constitution Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) Revoke Appeal to the Supreme Court It was allowed to consider the question whether the High Court had the right to deny arbitrary relief on the merits of the …
- J. H. NAQVI v. DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE 1966 PLD 512
Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 (XXVIII of 1958), Section 10 (b) Any other method of transfer is the order of the Central Government (section R0824 (k) / 61 dated 19, 19, u…
- MUHAMMADI OIL AND GENERAL MILLS v. INCOME-TAX OFFICER 1966 PLD 519
The Income Tax Act, 1922, is responsible for review under section 28 of section 44, section 28 of which can be imposed on a criminal offense or its partners for deliberately concealing details of inco…
- MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR-UL-HAQ v. INCOME-TAX OFFICER 1966 PLD 524
The Income Tax Act 1922 was read with section 44 section 63 and the intention of the dissolved firm for super tax notices was presented to a partner, even if all the partners were responsible for the …
- RABIA BIBI v. RASOOL BAKHSH 1966 PLD 531
Pakistan Constitution 1962 Article 58 (3) Article 61 was read with leave to appeal the Supreme Court hearing on the order of acquittal in the murder of the High Court in which the accused was sentence…
- ABDUS SABOOR KHAN v. KARACHI UNIVERSITY 1966 PLD 536
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 98 Administrative Tribunal was authorized to take decisions after the investigation of the preceding incident, showing the notice required in the absence of p…
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. SHABBIR & CO 1966 PLD 540
Section 10 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1922 deducted from the loss of minor business in Assisi by robbery by the employee of the vehicle in which the assessee's accountant was taking money in the custom…
- PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN v. SALIM ULLAH 1966 PLD 547
(I of 1894), section 23 (1), clarification added by the Land Acquisition (Punjab Amendment) Act (XII of 1954) - not enforceable [on the proposed acquisition of a law enacted by the amendment Act Not p…
- SIKANDAR v. STATE 1966 PLD 555
Pakistan Panel Code Section 300, Exception IV Sudden Fighting ue Illegal Advantage \ Determine the weapons available on bilateral weapons and generally disarm by the accused victim, using a knife on t…
- GHULAM SARWAR v. IMTIAZ NAZIR 1966 PLD 559
The Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act 1948 section 2 (as it stands before the implementation of the Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act (Amendment) Act of 1951) does not include…
- SADIQ ALI v. STATE 1966 PLD 589
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) read with sections 498 sections 496 and 497 (bail before arrest) The Sessions Court may be directed to approve the bail of a person whose arrest is imminent without a w…
- UMAR HAYAT v. STATE 1966 PLD 602
The leave to appeal in the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) is allowed to consider whether the reduced life sentence was not appropriate in the case of murder where a woman was affected. T…
- KHAIR MUHAMMAD KHAN v. STATE 1966 PLD 604
Paragraph 14 reads with paragraph 27 (Owner's choice to retain a particular parcel of his property) The lakes have formed part of the property, but the Land Commissioner has not decided whether the la…
- MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN v. YAR MUHAMMAD KHAN 1966 PLD 612
Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act 1912 read with Section 19 Section 21 (Prohibition of transfer of rights in tenancy), sale, exchange etc. or other private agreement on the property of the ori…
- KHALID M. ISHAQUE v. CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT OF WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE 1966 PLD 628
Section 5 (3) of the General Clause Act, 1897, the central law shall be in force immediately upon the expiry of the day before its enactment, in applying the law to a place which it had not previously…
- MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN v. YAR MUHAMMAD KHAN 1966 PLD 639
The Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912 section 30, is to be read with a Schedule II Crown grant, according to its Tanner, no law or law is contrary to it when the government can resume gra…
- R. SIM & CO. LTD. v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE 1966 PLD 650
Read with Articles 3, 4 and 8 of the East Bengal General Clause Act, 1899, Section 22 of the East Bengal General Clause Act, 1899, the approval of the section 22 property but not yet occupied by the D…
- INCOME-TAX OFFICER (INVESTIGATION) CIRCLE 111, DACCA, AND v. Shaikh NASIM ANWAR 1966 PTD 657
Central Board of Revenue Act 1924 Section 3 (Ruling Authority, Central Government) Rules governing business transactions through the Central Board of Revenue, under the general jurisdiction of the R3 …
- ABDUL AZIZ v. BASHIR AHMAD 1966 PLD 658
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 (1), (5) (Guaranteed in case of sick and sick person) In the murder case, the Additional Sessions Judge granted bail, in which case the Magistrates' Court…
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. MEAJAN ALI AHMAD 1966 PLD 661
In the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3), the High Court's decision allowed two investigations into the attack, namely, (1) Section 115 has no jurisdiction to reverse the conclusions of fac…
- MUHAMMADI STEAMSHIP Co. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL), KARACHI 1966 PTD 664
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 15B (1), (3) Fixed deposits are not allocated or used for any purpose No employment in under-tax capital Capital must be actively employed. Interpretation of the Laws No wo…
- STATE v. MANZOOR AHMAD 1966 PLD 664
Pakistan Penal Code Section 100 was read with Section 300, exception 4 The right of defense (not the plea of the accused) is not found where the accused gave the accused more power, threw him to the g…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ MUHAMMAD UMAR v. AUSTRALASIA BANK LTD 1966 PLD 684
Accessing the CPC appeals from the original decree of the CLC Code Order XML O XLI, r 27 (1), (2) Additional evidence 6e The actual requirement for admission requirements must be felt by the court in …
- MAHMOOD BEG v. COMMISSIONER, MULTAN 1966 PLD 701
The powers of the Section 3 Commissioner of the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1963, may be exercised by the District Magistrate on the recommendation of the Tribunal. , Criminal Code of …
- NUR ELAHI v. STATE 1966 PLD 708
Sections 233 and 239 read with sections 208, 213, 270, 286 and 540A (separate or joint trial) (murder case) (trial of the case), two versions of the case, two completely different sets of accused Also…
- MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. BASHIR AHMAD 1966 PLD 717
In the constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3), the discretion of arbitrary powers against arbitrary orders is generally not granted as such powers are not disobeyed or used unlawfully [Interim i…
- ABDUL HAMID KHAN v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1966 PLD 719
Displaced persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 Section 2 (4) was read with Government of Pakistan Memorandum No. F3 (1) / 60 S1, dated 30 7 1962 and press note dated 22 10 1962 of the C…
- PAKISTAN OXYGEN LTD. v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1966 PLD 723
Application Section 7 (AAA) of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948 (i) requires entities that are not interested and do not appear at the time of assessment of compensation Section 7 (AAA) (…
- CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD v. ABDUL MAJID SARDAR 1966 PLD 725
Constitution of Pakistan 1956 Article 181 Railway was temporarily promoted by Tally Clerk as exchange of ticket collector Tlie Clerk is not being reduced to service as temporary service personnel are …
- EMPLOYEES\' ASSOCIATION v. CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL COURT 1966 PLD 731
Section 28D of the Trade Unions Act of 1926 read with the Industrial Disputes Ordinance (LVI of 1959), Section 34 of these recognized trade unions, though registered, has the power to take industrial …
- OCEAN INDUSTRIES LTD. v. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK 1966 PLD 738
Sections 39 (1) (7), (8) (9), 40 and 41 of the Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan Ordinance 1961, the methods provided for enforcement of the bank's claims are not substitutes on the Managing Boa…
- MRS. MOMTAZ MALLIK v. TAXING OFFICER 1966 PLD 753
Constitution Pakistan (1962), Arts 91, 98 (5) and 242 reads the Court Fees Act 1870 Section 5 with the taxing officer, the custodial jurisdiction or administrative control over the tax officer, a lega…
- MAZHARUL HUQ BHUIYAN v. PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1966 PLD 758
Section 2 (1) Deputy Commissioner has the option of exercising the powers of Additional Deputy Commissioner only in the case of Assistant Commissioners and Additional Assistant Commissioners when ther…
- EBADUR RAHMAN v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 1966 PLD 762
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 98 (4) writ petition must be satisfied before receiving a provisional order in the court that the impugned order is clearly a violation of anything in force o…
- ABBASI .TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. INDUSTRIAL COURT 1966 PLD 765
Industrial Disputes Ordinance 1959 Section 12 Industrial Disputes Award The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the victim's search, restating the restitution due to misconduct for union activity,…
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. ABU FARID KHAN 1966 PLD 772
Section 31 (1) of the East Pakistan Public Safety Ordinance 1958, section 31 (1), applies not to any single incident but to repeated offenses.…
- INCOME-TAX OFFICER v. NASIM ANWAR 1966 PLD 775
Section 3 of the Central Board of Revenue Act, 1924 (rules governing business transactions through the Central Board of Revenue) was neither signed by the Member Board nor by the Secretary Board but b…
- MUHAMMAD SAEED v. MUHABBAT ALI 1966 PLD 781
Pakistan (Administration for Evacuation Property) Act 1957 Section 3A [Amendment Act (XLV of 1958 added) which amended the Act (XXII of 1959) and read with Section 43 (6) and General Clause Act (X of …
- COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS v. A. K. M. WALIULLAH CHOWDHURY 1966 PLD 788
The Constitution of Pakistan 1956 Article 181 (1) officially (temporarily) deputy superintendent of Central Excise and Land Customs was canceled by the collector, in fact denying the important post of…
- COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA DIVISION v. KHIZAR HAYAT 1966 PLD 793
Section 3 of the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1963, read with the first schedule some of which are mentioned in the first schedule and others not even if the Commissioner has been given…
- M. O. GHANI, VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF DACCA v. DR. A. N. M. MAHMOOD 1966 PLD 802
CPC temporarily starts contempt of court proceedings in connection with alleged disobedience of injunction and interlocutory injunction XXXIX, Civil Procedure Code Order XXXXX, R2 order verdict or aff…
- BARKAT ALI v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 1966 PLD 817
Section 2 (6), 3 and 4, Schedule, paragraph I of the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, issued under Section 2 (6) of the Government of Pakistan with Notification No. F1 (27…
- MUHAMMADI STEAMSHIP CO. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 1966 PLD 828
Income Tax Act 1922 15B (1), (3) Fixed deposits are not allocated or used for any purpose Capital not employed in under-tax capital A must be actively employed. No word shall be construed as a salary …
- MURLIDHAR v. UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI 1966 PLD 841
The University of Karachi Regulation University, Regulation 14 (ii), after questioning the two candidates, allowed them to continue the examination, talking to each other, and in the following days in…
- CHAIRMAN, EAST PAKISTAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. RUSTAM ALI 1966 PLD 848
Article 98 (2) (a) (ii) read with Article 177 (1) (a), an employee of the Legislative Corporation, namely, East Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation, seeking redress against dismissal, not appr…
- PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN v. SIRAJUL HAQ PATWARI 1966 PLD 854
The Electoral College Act, 1964 has been read with Section 57 Article 158 (4), Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 57 does not invalidate the National Assembly but under the Legislature to introd…
- AMIR-UD-DIN v. STATE 1966 PLD 971
Provisions of the provincial government on the relevant date in section 417 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC), a section of the West Pakistan Administration (Federal Territory of Karachi) Order (…
- SHAH WALI v. GHULAM DIN 1966 PLD 983
In the order of the Civil Procedure Code Order XX and RO 14, RO 14 and section 148, 104, 96 and 100 pre-emption suits of the CPC decision, the pre-emptor and the court set the time for submitting the …
- MUHAMMAD AYUB v. MUHAMMAD YAQUB 1966 PLD 1003
Sections 498, 497 and 496 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) guarantees the real nature and scope of the powers to the High Court and the Sessions Court under section 498 and to what extent section…
- SHAH WALI v. GHULAM DIN 1966 PLD 983
In the order of the Civil Procedure Code Order XX and RO 14, RO 14 and section 148, 104, 96 and 100 pre-emption suits of the CPC decision, the pre-emptor and the court set the time for submitting the …
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.