Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AZIZ-UR-RAHMAN versus HABIB BANO


Whether the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Shade, Part I must submit a form of CH in respect of a particular house by submitting an application in Form E for participation in the landmark scheme. Does not infringe upon the right of such house. Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court to consider the question

1970 S C M R 129

Present : A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Fazle‑Akbar, J

Syed AZIZ‑UR‑RAHMAN‑Petitioner

versus

Mst. HABIB BANO AND 5 OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 316 of 1967, decided on 3rd October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 30th March 1967, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 186 of 1964).

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958),

Sched., Part I‑Transfer of house‑Claimant filing CH Form in respect of particular house whether does not forfeit hic right to such house by filing application in Form E for participation in earmarking scheme‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.

Abdur Rashid's case Civil Petition No. 73 of 1965 ref.

M. B. Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Wali Muhammad, Senior Attorney for Petitioner.

Sultan Hussain, Special Attorney for Respondent No. 1.

Nemo for Respondents Nos. 2‑6.

Date of hearing : 3rd October 1967.

ORDER

CORNELIUS, C. J.

‑The office reports that this petition is time‑barred by 7 days, but on examining the stamp on the copy of the order sought to be appealed against, we find that the dates of preparation and delivery have been corrected and over written, and we accordingly leave the question open for decision at the hearing, in case objection is taken on the point.

In this case, the respondents' success is based on the High Court holding that .a. claimant, who has filed a CH Form in respect of a particular house does not forfeit the right to such house by filing an application in Form E for participation in an earmarking Scheme. This view is directly contrary to the expressed by this Court in a judgment in the case of Abdur Rashid Civil Petition No. 73 of 1965. It is pointed out by learned counsel that there are entries in Form E itself which point. to the conclusion that a person wishing to participate in an earmarking Scheme has to relinquish his claims under a CH Form.

We accordingly grant leave to appeal as prayed. Security Rs. 1,000. Stay of delivery of possession to continue.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Poonch lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.