Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAIZUL HAQUE KHAN versus ABDUL HAMID


Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation), Act (XXXXX8 of XXIII), Shadt Part I moved the house on a mere receipt basis indicating that he had filed an NCS form. The Supreme Court considered the appeal to the special court for whether the house was moved properly or not.

1970 S C M R 33

Present : A. R. Cornelius,, C. J. and S. A. Rahman, J

Haji FAIZUL HAQUE KHAN‑Petitioner

versus

Syed ABDUL HAMID AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 378 of 1967, decided on 26th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and. order, of the High Court of West Pakistan, Quetta,Circuit, Quetta, dated, the 11th August 1967, in Writ Petition No. 53 of 1966).

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation), Act (XXYIII of 1958)

, Sched Part I ‑Person transferred house on basis of merely a receipt showing that he had filed N. C. S Form ---Whether house properly transferred to him Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider, question.

Bashir Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed ,by Salim Ahmad Malik, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 26th, October ‑1967.

JUDGMENT

CORNELIUS, C. J.-

It is urged that the High Court has interfered with the order of the Additional Settlement Commis sioner, on misreading anti non Treading of the evidence. The case of the respondent Syed Abdul Hamid of being entitled to transfer of the disputed property is said to be based on nothing chore than a receipt produced which purports to show that he had put in a NCS form. There was no support from any other documents, e. g., entries in registers or proceedings on the form. It is urged that by itself this receipt proved nothing.

Moreover, the High Court had ignored the plain evidence that Syed Abdul Hamid only took possession of the disputed property in 1960, from one Raz Mohammad whom the petitioner was then trying to evict, by proper proceedings.

We consider that this case requires further examination and we grant leave to appeal as prayed. Security Rs. 1,000.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.