Supreme Court — Judgments of 1979
303 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1979 — page 1 of 4.
- ATTIQUE AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1979 SCMR 1
Section 7 and the Pakistan Rehabilitation Act (II of 1956), read with Section 6 Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme 1956, evacuation, allotment of property vacancies, no difference between asylum seekers…
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN NIAZI v. VICE CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB 1979 PLD 1
General Dispensary Rules, Section III, r 3 (vii) Read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Proposal of Principles (1973) of Article 12, CL (B) of the Constitution under Article 12 from the question R…
- SHAH MUHAMMAD v. SHAUKAT ALI 1979 SCMR 6
Article 185 (3) read with the Settlement Scheme, Para 24 Applicant, on the basis of his claim, is entitled to terminate all remedies and adjusts his temporary claim against the urban areas and fails i…
- MUHAMMAD MUSA v. JAMAL MUHAMMAD 1979 SCMR 7
Article 185 (3) read with the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), XLI, r 27 The finding of the first appellate court was not challenged before the High Court nor was the applicant in his plea. Who actua…
- MUHAMMAD FAZAL ALIAS BODI v. STATE 1979 SCMR 9
Section 7/7/8 Principle of Guaranteed Authorization The co-accused also played the same role as the applicant on bail, the applicant should be released on bail on the principle of need for consistency…
- HABIB BANK LTD. v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CO. 1979 SCMR 10
Section 175 Official Liquidator Bank Guarantee The public prosecutor remains under the control, direction and supervision of the court until his or her assignment, in the event of any bank guarantee, …
- EHSAN ELAHI v. STATE 1979 SCMR 11
Article 188 reads with the Supreme Court 1 Rules, (1956, AXXVI Review (Offender)), that the error on the face of the record cannot be construed as patent but by consideration of the material on the re…
- USMATULLAH KHAN v. ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE JHELUM 1979 SCMR 12
Article 64 and the Punjab Local Government Act (XXXX of XXIV), the writ petition has already expired in the jurisdiction of the writ to establish a private cattle market or the Supreme Court in its ap…
- M. G. HASSAN v. RIAZUL HAQ 1979 SCMR 15
Read with OVI, r 17 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), amending Article 120 of the Profitable Claims Boundary will not allow defendants to take pre-existing legal rights or amend the suit color. So that lit…
- SALAHUDDIN v. DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER II 1979 PLD 16
Allow appeal to be heard as soon as Article 3 (ac) was moved to the opposition party in Sun in Ev in in, but applicants did not protest their claim on such property until 1975. The transfer order was …
- GOVERNMENT OF SIND v. HUSINA 1979 SCMR 17
Section 401 reads with constitution Pakistan (1973), Arts 49, 104, 129, 135, 139, 180 and 260 and exemptions from business rules, Government of Sindh suspension and punishment, for release of offender…
- AFZAL BEGUM v. Y.M.C.A. 1979 PLD 18
A. XXXII, r 3 (5) The termination of the appointment of a guardian is set by the court of the Guardian to prosecute the minor as in this case in all proceedings, including appeal and review or executi…
- KHUSHI MUHAMMAD v. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, LAHORE 1979 SCMR 20
OI, r 10 & O XXXIX, r 1 As a party to the applicant, if the applicant is subject to a delay even after the applicant's application has been increased, then the application will be successful if the ap…
- IMTIAZ ALI MALIK v. SURRYA BEGUM 1979 SCMR 22
Scheduled allotment plots of vacated properties were allotted to the respondents under the orders of the Chief Minister and the formal allotment letter also awarded them the property rights, which are…
- GHULAM NABI v. STATE 1979 SCMR 24
The Section 497 bail applicant has suffered maximum 24 injuries, one injury is painful to the applicant and no explanation has been given in the FIR regarding such injury, which the High Court had ear…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ v. STATE 1979 SCMR 26
Sections 7 497 and P 498 guaranteed that he had received a stab wound to his head and medical injury as per medical evidence, however, three persons were injured and one of them was in the eye of the …
- RABIA v. AHMAD ALI 1979 SCMR 28
Article 115 read with Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the reviewing High Court refuses to interfere with the First Appeal Court's order, which is a matter of arbitration exercise and such arbitrat…
- REHMAT ALI v. THE STATE 1979 SCMR 30
Section 497 Bail Further inquiry Complainant then refer to his version as given in the FIR and the accused under section 164, Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, has been declared innocent witness, accused…
- SHAHNAZ MAQBOOL v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1979 PLD 32
Note on application form for admission to study Section 115 Medical College: Any incomplete admission form will not be entertained and the candidate will not be requested for interview. It is allegedl…
- THE THAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD. v. THE BANK OF BAHAWALPUR 1979 SCMR 32
Appeals for review of sections 100 and 115 were filed within a timely manner, but some wrongdoing requests have been requested to be treated in the same review, as an appeal to the proper definition o…
- MUHARRAM v. STATE 1979 SCMR 34
In the circumstances of the High Court, where the applicant of the Section 498 bail was found to have beaten the suspect with a hockey stick and caused serious injury to the head of the deceased by me…
- SADIQ ALI v. ABDUR RASHID 1979 SCMR 35
Section 302/149 [Matter of Murder] Reduction of sentence with general intent. If the ingredients of section 149 are proved, the offense of every member of the unlawful assembly, regardless of the crim…
- ZULFIKAR ALI BHUTTO v. THE STATE 1979 PLD 38
O XI, 1 Appeal (Criminal) Bench, Supreme Court Criminal Appeals Formation will be heard by a Bench consisting of three judges nominated by the Chief Justice nine judges, who initially requested the re…
- ZAHID HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1979 SCMR 38
The names of the accused 497 are not mentioned in the FIR. No defamatory article was recovered from them. The dispute is that the accused is known to the complainant, there was no need to hold the ide…
- RIZWAAN CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. v. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY 1979 SCMR 40
O XXVI Reviewed: Appeal not repeated Not valid in the review process Either new land or land is extended in a manner not discussed [Review Exercise and Procedure]…
- GHULAM SARWAR v. STATE 1979 SCMR 43
Article 188 Review The High Court, while accepting the conclusion of the High Court, excludes the applicant and the possibility of making a false decision to sentence the Supreme Court to him and the …
- ALLAH WASSAYA v. FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION 1979 PLD 44
Article 2? A. [Inserted by Order No. 3 of the CMLA 1977] and read Article 2 (2) with clarification [as included in the CMLA Order No. 1977] and the Constitution of Pakistan (1973). , Article 199 "Theo…
- DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE v. SAFDAR HUSSAIN SHAH 1979 SCMR 45
The delay in the deal was delayed by 45 days for appeal to the Supreme Court for leave on the deal, but the delay was delayed due to a government inquiry into various matters. And that's why this proc…
- ABDUL AZIZ v. ABDUL SATTAR 1979 SCMR 46
Section 5 Delay Inspection Attempt to apologize due to a lawyer who originally received full court fees for delaying the reduction of fees, but his clerk has received a lower court fee: every day's de…
- ZULFIQAR v. RAMZAN 1979 SCMR 48
Discussion of grave and sudden provocations read with section 302, section 300, exceptions I [murder case], which sought to provoke itself by provoking itself as provocation and thus taking advantage …
- WAJI-UL-HASSAN ZAIDI v. S.H.O POLICE STATION 1979 PLD 49
Section 156 was read with the Police Act (along with V. 1868), the inquiry of the matter to the Assistant Commissioner regarding the alleged height and order of the police on the filing of a case repo…
- TAHIR ALI v. THE STATE 1979 SCMR 50
Read with Section 498, Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 376 observed by Rep. Bell Corps in his order by the High Court. A woman in this part of the country, when she is unmarried, will raise her cred…
- KHALID FAROOQ v. NAZAR MUHAMMAD 1979 SCMR 52
Article 5 Delayed Counsel Some Mofussil lawyers and such lawyers have not consulted with any standard work related to the law, but have allowed some research, which has no document or affidavit of som…
- FAIZ MUHAMMAD v. GUL KHAN 1979 SCMR 54
Sections 7 497 and 8 88 Receiving firearm injury in a widespread incident and no record of attributing it to the applicant There is no indication that the complainant falsely applied for the real atta…
- ANSAR MAHMOOD v. STATE 1979 SCMR 55
Section 497 (5) The cancellation of the bail petitioner is not accused of making any allegation of a serious criminal offense and yet the degree of involvement in the incident, due to political or sim…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. STATE 1979 SCMR 56
Before the Sections 497 and 498 bail, the arrest investigation officer alleged that he did not appear or meet with the accused applicant in the opinion of the petitioner, who falsely or falsely filed …
- GHULAM FATIMA v. AMANULLAH 1979 SCMR 58
Article 4 ((())) on any occasion does not permit the applicant to take his or her right or occupy the house or establish facts in the case in which the matters of the case and the matters are settled …
- SHER v. THE STATE 1979 SCMR 60
Section 497 Bail [Murder Case] Midnight the murder allegedly made it difficult to identify the assailants with any statement of Witness H, even though the accused applicant was involved and his statem…
- KHAQAN INDUSTRIES LTD. v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 1979 SCMR 62
Section 137 (1), (5) and (6) and 138 investigating the company's affairs notice to the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies, requesting the Company to submit a clarification on the complaint received and …
- BARKAT BIBI v. GULZAR 1979 SCMR 65
Section 302/34 of the Code read with criminal (v. 18981, Section 497 (5j Joint Intent Guarantee)), playing the part of the respondent with his co-accused and taking an active part in the transaction a…
- FAIZ RASOOL v. STATE 1979 SCMR 67
Delays in Sections 7 & 7 and Delay8 bail are not valid grounds for bail, yet the accused may still be entitled to bail in case of irresponsible and unlawful delay in the case in which the applicant fr…
- MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF /C. M. L. 1979 SCMR 69
Article 48 (Continuation in Law) Order, 1977 [No. 1 of CMLA 197 1977], Article 3 (L) Mercy advised the Chief Martial Law Administrator to deal with the President in accordance with the advice of the C…
- TUFAIL MUHAMMAD v. ABDUL RAHIM ETC. 1979 SCMR 71
Article 188 Review Application has been filed after more than a year and a half due to a private complaint due to a request for leave and an FIR has been filed in connection with the same. Source dism…
- MUHAMMAD AYUB SHAH v. SARWAR SHAH 1979 SCMR 72
Section 31 Limitation Applicants are not taking any plea as to the limitation question in their written statement, nor have they raised any issue, nor have the petitioners filed in the District Judge …
- WEST PAKISTAN CO OPERATIVE CONSUMERS SOCIETY LTD. v. NADEEM NAWAZISH MALIK 1979 SCMR 76
Section 5 Delays Delays An attempt has been made to deal with the delay being completely vague, the application for lack of all details, and the non-payment of rent due to circumstances beyond the con…
- BANTVA MEMON CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. ANIS ALI KHAN, 1979 SCMR 77
A XXXIX, R1 & 2 Innovation Facility Balancing Applicants A Housing Society Alleged Land Purchase, Mapping, Residential Plots According to a development scheme, many members of the Society are building…
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. STATE 1979 SCMR 79
Section 222 alleges that the recovery of jewelery from the applicant is not disputed, the applicant is not claiming the jewelry because his own FIR applicant filed about the theft of jewelry long befo…
- HABIB ALIAS MULLAH v. SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER (LAND), HYDERABAD DIVISION, HYDERABAD 1979 SCMR 81
Article 4 (185 ()) by special leave to appeal to the High Court by a broad order, as well as in the matter relating to the department, does not include any case related to any law, nor is the High Cou…
- FOUR FRIENDS v. DOMCX BORIC 1979 SCMR 83
Article 188 read with the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), A XXXX, rr 1 and 2 the trial court temporarily refused the injunction because of the applicant's right to prosecute in the pharma pauperis. …
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI 1979 SCMR 85
OV, r 20 and O IX, r 13 The Alternate Service returned with the notice of the previous order not available at the address given to the defendant, keeping the summons issued to the defendant. Acknowled…
- SHARIFAN v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 1979 SCMR 88
Article 184 Institution of application for transfer to another court in a civil court in civil court, Article 184 is not guaranteed…
- MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. STATE 1979 SCMR 89
In relation to the review of Clause 188, there is no validity of the review regarding the re-evaluation of the evidence, which resulted in the evidence pointing to the conclusion of the evidence and w…
- RAIS KHAN v. SAID HANIF 1979 SCMR 90
Section 7 497 (bail) Reversal of bail The High Court dismissed the applicant's bail for consideration, pending several years, and the evidence available for his involvement and the co-accused's involv…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. PATTEN MALAK 1979 SCMR 91
After complimenting the overall facts and issues of the defendant's case having certain characteristics of the distinguished character of the case of another accused (not released on bail), the matter…
- MUHAMMAD RASHID v. STATE 1979 SCMR 92
Sections 497 and 498 were read with the Partial Regulation (XLV of 1860), the responsibility for Section 149 bail was granted by the courts on the basis of the material placed on them, such as stateme…
- KHUSHI MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1979 SCMR 94
Section 1 561A and 249 of the criminal proceedings, excluding any material on record and dismissing the High Court's request to the accused applicants to exclude the date of the hearing of the petitio…
- SANA ULLAH v. MUHAMMAD AKHTAR ETC. 1979 SCMR 97
The Article 199 written jurisdiction states that because of the District Judge's case of Rs. 92,000, he has no jurisdiction to dismiss the review petition on the basis of appeal by the High Court. Be …
- RASHIDUDDIN QURESHI v. THE STATE 1979 SCMR 99
Article 188 The review petitioner's question which has been compromised with the accused entering through the applicant and the Supreme Court found correct in the earlier proceedings for leave of appe…
- HABIBULLAH v. STATE 1979 SCMR 100
Article 4 (185 ()) Special Leave to Appeal Despite the High Court's direction, it is not yet certain when the Sessions Judge will prosecute for trial and, likewise, on bail after the accused has been …
- SHAH MUHAMMAD ETC. v. THE STATE 1979 SCMR 101
Section 497/498 with the names of the accused and the names of the accused, along with the allegedly used weapons in attacking the accused and wounding the prosecution witnesses mentioned in the First…
- FALAK SHER v. STATE 1979 SCMR 103
In the preliminary statement of the prosecution's further inquiry into section 497 (2), the prosecution did not explain how the applicants and the deceased were treated the day before in Chuck, nor di…
- MUHAMMAD JAFFAR v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1979 SCMR 106
Article 3 (3 ()) Questions to fall under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court / Court will not interfere in its exclusive jurisdiction [Question of fact]…
- CRESCENT FILMS, LAHORE v. MUMTAZ MUHAMMAD KHAN 1979 SCMR 107
O XXXIX, r 1 provisional injunction restrained inspections temporarily subject to injunction proceedings, are only temporary and are not a matter of discrimination on the merits [integration]…
- FAZAL ELAHI v. MISS FARAH NAZ 1979 SCMR 109
Under section 497 (1), in all cases of the minority of the applicant, bail is not required that Proviso guarantees arbitrarily with the court even in the case of bail, even if the applicant has a slig…
- SYED QAJI-UL-HASSAN ZAIDI v. THE STATE 1979 SCMR 112
Proof of Section 497 Bail Prosecution cannot be extracted in a minute detail during the request for bail, after a responsible inquiry by Assistant Commissioner recovered women from different places in…
- HAKIM ALI v. STATE 1979 SCMR 114
Section 497 (2) Tulsia Further Investigation That Means Different Perspectives And Applicants In The Investigation Case It Is Decided That They Cannot Be Detained By The Prosecution There Is No Conclu…
- ALI GOHAR v. STATE 1979 SCMR 116
Claims of injured persons in section 7 497 and In 8 B bail (during interrogation) were caused by fireworks injuries and not by the applicant and other accused but allegedly two-handed injuries resulti…
- MUHAMMAD HANIF v. AHMAD HUSSAIN 1979 SCMR 118
Section 13 (3) (a) (iii) (b) and (c) Withdrawal Personal requirement In addition to alleging that the responsible landlord owns other shops, the landlord has not been asked whether he has There is ano…
- RAZA KHAN v. FAQIR MUHAMMAD 1979 SCMR 119
Section 7 497 / Coun sel8 Bail Counsel Failing to identify any situation, the judge held, is sufficiently justified to do so and his order is properly upheld by the High Court [clear liability]…
- BARISH ALI v. STATE 1979 SCMR 123
Section 2 302/149 case (testimony of murder) Testimony of the eye The eye witnesses were closely linked to the enmity, and the evidence alone was present at the time of the occurrence of many witnesse…
- SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, N: W. F. P.GOVERNMENT, PESHAWAR v. COLONY SARHAD TEXTILE MILLS 1979 PLC 124
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 12 (6) [such as West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (LI of 1972…
- ABDUL RASHID ALIAS SHEEDA v. STATE 1979 SCMR 129
Section 497 Medical Report states that the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 307 and 320, was read with the eighth bail counsel and that the police admitted to the hospital on record of maintaining f…
- GHAUS MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1979 SCMR 130
The Revenue Officer dealing with the operations of the section 195 (1) (c) does not act as a court, any offense committed before such Revenue Officer, in the case of any judicial provision of section …
- AKBAR ALI v. STATE 1979 SCMR 132
Sections 497 and 498 of the appellants from time to time take the contradictory stance Albee's plates are contradictory at various stages and do not even support the evidence of the persons with whom …
- ASGHAR ALI SHAH v. STATE 1979 SCMR 134
This offense in the jurisdiction of Section 409/420/467/468/471 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) and the Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), Section 5 (l). That is h…
- ALLAH BAKHSH v. NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH 1979 SCMR 137
Section 497 (2) The bail bail filed by the alleged eyewitnesses will be considered by the trial judge, excluding the defendant from the commission of the crime, whether it can be said that the respond…
- MUHAMMAD SADDIQ v. SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN 1979 SCMR 139
Article 17 Civil Service Seniority Petitioner, who has a former cadre post in his hometown on the distribution of his resident One Unit, cannot claim the seniority in the same cadre of the same depart…
- ALI MUHAMMAD v. ABDULLAH KHAN 1979 SCMR 141
Section 15, the third with the Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1887), reads nothing on the section 3 (1) pre-requisite record in which two villages have not been completed and two related properties …
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. FAZAL MUHAMMAD 1979 SCMR 144
R 18 (d) Rule 18 (d) applies to dismissal matters, not to the question of appointment of Rule 18 (d) [limber]…
- MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ v. STATE 1979 SCMR 146
Section 498 guarantees the matter primarily under the High Court's discretion, not acting in any arbitrary manner and not regulating its discretion with respect to its notice, case, hearing, incoming …
- MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. AHMAD NAWAZ MALIK 1979 SCMR 147
Section 24 Transfer of Civil Cases There was no basis for transferring unfair allegations against the trial court and transfer of the case, thereby constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) for…
- EASTERN COMPANY (PRIVATE) LTD. v. GUL BEGUM 1979 SCMR 150
Section 151 Temporary Observations Regarding some of the observations made in the High Court's uncontested order, it may be deemed that the parties concerned presented the relevant matters on the meri…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. SULTAN SALEEM 1979 SCMR 153
Section 77 77 Account Applicants Applicants are responsible for the settlement of accounts and payment of the amount received thereafter, under the recipient of the disputed land or the co-owners as t…
- MANZOOR ALIM v. GHULAM KUBRA 1979 SCMR 154
Article 17 Equal Rights of Pre-Disciplinary Right, by its terms, becomes operative only on the failure of the pre-emptive sets of pre-kings to submit the required data to their predecessor, the terms …
- NOOR MUHAMMAD QURESHI v. THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS QUETTA 1979 SCMR 157
The section contractor reserves the right to terminate the contract before the expiry of a contract by assigning the responsible railway responsible for the breach of contract without any reason and w…
- MUHAMMAD MUNAWAR v. KHURSHID ALAM 1979 SCMR 159
Section 152 Homeowners Rescuing Accidental Mistakes In their eviction application, the suit property is mentioned in PP24, which includes a shop and residential apartment, property on behalf of the ap…
- ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE v. AHMAN 1979 SCMR 162
Section [33 [as amended by the Canal and Sewerage (Punjab Amendment) Ordinance, 1971 1971 1971 XVIII of 1971), Section 2] read with the rules framed under the Canal and Sewerage Act, 1873, r 33 Water …
- AHMAD YAR v. PUNJAB PROVINCE 1979 SCMR 166
O XXXIX, R and 1 and 2 temporary injunction counsel are unable to state what irreparable harm their clients may incur in the absence of an invalid order, to interfere with the High Court's finding. No…
- KHALILUR REHMAN v. STATE 1979 SCMR 168
Section 497 (2) Complaint for further investigation filed by the deposed party appeared to the magistrate after approximately one month's incident and delayed the police refusing to file a medical rep…
- IRSHAD v. STATE 1979 SCMR 170
The Section 497 bail plea is initially separate from the case of the co-accused who has been released on bail, on the contrary, certain sections of the co-accused, which are attributable to the applic…
- MUHAMMAD DIN v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM 1979 SCMR 172
Read with ACLI, R 19, Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 appeals reversal Deletion delayed default Application for restoration of appeal in default 5, Limitation Act, 1908 Request Registered notic…
- ABDUR REHMAN v. ABDUL SHAKOOR 1979 SCMR 173
A. XXXVII1, r and 5 and 6 read with O XLIII, Attachment for r 1 (Q) attachment may be approved under Order R6 and A XXXVIII attachment may not be approved under R5, approved under O XXXVIII. Has appea…
- KHALILUZ ZAMAN v. STATE 1979 SCMR 176
The question regarding the delay in Section 497/498 bail is whether the applicants are entitled to bail on the basis of delay. Can be heard within months. At the hearing of the case, holding is not va…
- GHULAM RASUL v. STATE 1979 SCMR 177
Further investigations into Section 497 (2) bail applicants, whose names are listed in the FIR, and those allegedly associated with Belams and Dangs, are also relevant to the applicants' case, not eve…
- SAKHI MUHAMMAD v. CHAIRMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL SHEIKHUPURA 1979 SCMR 179
Section 37 violates the terms of the contract the applicant is only part of the land in the dispute and his status is only admissible under the respondent's one-month notice of the licensor in which t…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. AHMAD KHAN 1979 SCMR 180
Rehabilitation Scheme, Part 1, Para 4 with Paragraph 2 (1), Read 10 and 11 raised an objection for the first time in the High Court but never before the settlement authorities did it appear that the c…
- MEHR MUHAMMAD v. DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1979 SCMR 182
In the High Court Petition, before the filing of the writ petition, a section 27 suit petition against the deceased person, an order disqualifying from filing against a deceased person, has been passe…
- ABDUL LATIF v. JAMAL DIN 1979 SCMR 183
Appellant's lawyer for services A III, rr 4 (2) and 5, is informed of the date of the hearing, until information is received by the court, unless reported to the court. On the other hand, the briefing…
- CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY v. HOSHANG M. DASTUR 1979 SCMR 191
Seventh-twelfth, r 1 Delay of Decision Demand for special leave for appeal in civil proceedings, to be entered within sixty days of appeal decision against the court, however, in filing the petitioner…
- IMAM BAKHSH v. MUHAMMAD BAKHSH 1979 SCMR 197
Section 497's version of the prosecution and the eyewitness who identify the wounds on all the accused in the joint intention of the accused, and the High Court responsible for all the violations, so …
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.