Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HOME SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN versus JAN MUHAMMAD


The West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (VII of 1963), Articles 3 and 25, allow the Commissioner to consider the question of the special leave of appeal before the Commissioner ordering the accused to bail the hearing. Give

1970 S C M R 32

Present : A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and S. A. Rahman, J

THE HOME SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

WEST PAKISTAN, HOME DEPARTMENT, LAHORE AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

JAN MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 339 of 1967, decided on 26th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 31st July 1967, in Writ Petition No. 329 of 1965).

West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (VII of 1963),

Ss. 3 & 25‑Whether Commissioner before making order of reference bound to grant hearing to accused person‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.

Raja Said Akbar, Advocate‑General West Pakistan (Aslam Riaz Hussain, Assistant Advocate‑General with him) instructed by Ijaz Ali, Attorney for Petitioners.

M. A. Buttar, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ali Aman Naqvi, Attorney for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 26th October 1967.

JUDGMENT

CORNELIUS, C. J.

.The High Court has held, on an interpre tation of Section .3 of the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, reading it with section 25 of the Act, that it is incumbent upon the Commissioner to grant a hearing to the accused person, before making an order of reference to a Tribunal of his case number of precedent authorities‑‑have been examined in the judgment. The argument of the learned Advocate General that a question of law arises for final determination by this Court, is clearly supported. We accordingly grant leave to appeal as prayed.

A prayer is made for stay of the direction of the Full Bench that the cases concerned be returned to the Division Benches which are seized of them for disposal in accordance with the view expressed by the Full. Bench. It is desirable that effect should not be given to that view until the appeal is decided. We accordingly grant stay as‑prayed.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Haripur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.