Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

REHMAT ULLAH versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER


The applicant's illness was not found to be delayed in filing the petition because of the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, XX, r 1, as he was also completely disqualified from giving written instructions to his lawyer.

1970 S C M R 66

Present : S. A. Rahman and Fazle‑Akbar, JJ

Haji REHMAT ULLAH‑Petitioner

versus

SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER,

LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 284 of 1967, decided on 12th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 9th December 1966, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 896 of 1966).

Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O. XIII,

r. 1‑Delay in filing petition alleged due to illness of petitioner‑Illness not found such as to totally incapacitate him from giving even written instructions to his lawyer Condonation of delay refused.

Abdul Manan Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent No. 1.

Ghulam Mujtaba, Attorney (absent) for Respondent No. 2.

Date of hearing : 12th October 1967.

JUDGMENT

FAZLE‑AKBAR, J

‑This petition is barred by time by 167 days.

In the petition for condonation of the delay it is stated that as the petitioner had a serious attack of rheumatism of back with sciatica' he could not file this petition in time. From the certificate of the doctor it appears that he suffered from the said ailments from 25‑1‑67 at frequent intervals. His illness was not of such a nature so as to totally incapacitate him from taking necessary steps for filing petition for special leave. He could have easily given written instructions to his lawyer. The explanation for the delay is therefore not considered at all satisfactory.

This petition is accordingly dismissed as time‑barred.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.