Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT


West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance (VI of 1959), Section I5 The Vent High Court exercised discretion as per the court rule in the second appeal against the rent controller's order and whether the order passed by a single judge Special leave for the patent bench to appeal the special leave. Not eligible for special leave appealed by Supreme Court to consider question to Supreme Court

1970 S C M R 60

Present : A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Fazle‑Akbar, J

Malik GHULAM HUSSAIN‑Petitioner

versus

Haji MUHAMMAD HAYAT-Respondent

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 371 of 1967, decided on 5th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 9th June 1967, in Second Appeal No. 34 of 1966).

West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)

, S. I5‑Weather High Court in second appeal against order of Rent Controller exercised discretion in accordance with judicial principle and whether order passed by Single judge being appeasable to Letters Patent Bench‑‑Special Leave to Appeal direct to Supreme Court not competent‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.

Iftikharul Haq Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Petitioner.

M. A. Zullah, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Khawaja Shaukat Ali, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Fazle‑i‑Hussain, Attorney for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 5th October 1967.

ORDER

CORNELIUS, C. J.

‑A point of law arises in this case, viz. whether in second appeal against an order of a ‑ Rent Controller made in a petition for ejectment of a tenant, the High Court has exercised discretion in accordance with judicial principle, in reduc ing to Rs. 20 per month, the rent of the property in question, which had been claimed at Rs. 120 per month by the landlord, had been fixed at Rs. 80 per month by the Rent Controller (tentatively, but it became permanent due to subsequent default of compliance by the tenant) and had been reduced to Rs. 50 per month in appeal by a District Judge.

There are objections raised to the grant of leave, on behalf of the landlord. viz. :----

(1) that by the force of section 30, Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, the terms and condi tions prior to transfer, are unsuitable and

(2) the order against which leave to appeal is sought being by a single Judge, an appeal was competent within the High Court; under the Letters Patent.

These are also questions of law, requiring decision. We grant leave to appeal as prayed. Security Rs: 1,000. Costs of this petition will be costs in the appeal.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Multan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.