Supreme Court — Judgments of 1968
338 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1968 — page 3 of 4.
- 1968 SCMR 1314 1968 SCMR 1314
Eyewitness testimony does not believe in the honor of three of the five accused because they cannot be recovered while in the present case witnesses are sent to the rest of the accused as well as to t…
- 1968 SCMR 1316 1968 SCMR 1316
The Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Schedule, Part II and Settlement Scheme No. VIII Properties have already been transferred before the issuance of Settlement…
- 1968 SCMR 1317 1968 SCMR 1317
In the writ jurisdiction over property transfer cases, the High Court appealed to the special parties to consider whether Schedule Parts I and II High Court had properly implemented the principles in …
- SARWAT HAFIZ v. ABDUL WADOOD 1968 PCRLJ 1318
Section 497 bail application for Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) revocation directs the High Court to appear in person or through a lawyer, but to submit personally to the cancellation of bail under fa…
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1320
Sections 302 and 300, exception 2 The right of private defense of the person seriously injured by the attacker is the death of the opponent.…
- 1968 SCMR 1320 1968 SCMR 1320
Sections 497 and the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/149 Bail Sessions Court, granted an accused that the defendant had not suffered a sharp weapon weapon while the accused was charged with…
- 1968 SCMR 1323 1968 SCMR 1323
Sections 420, 460 and 471 and Criminal Procedure (V 1898), section 195 question whether the presiding officer of a civil court is eligible to file a complaint against a witness under Sections 420, 460…
- 1968 SCMR 1325 1968 SCMR 1325
Sections 302 and 148 of the High Court ruled that the trial court's reliance on the evidence of the witness alone was not inappropriate, and the Supreme Court denied proper leave of appeal.…
- WAHID BAKHSH v. MIR MUHAMMAD 1968 PCRLJ 1327
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 148 and 323 Sentencing Specia appealed for leave because medical evidence has expressed the opinion that the prosecution's witnesses may be in danger of injury to themselv…
- 1968 SCMR 1327 1968 SCMR 1327
Article 123 The Magistrate informing the Magistrate has alleged that he intended to transfer the case under Section 526, CR PC for transfer of the case and thus the Magistrate may be postponed in this…
- 1968 SCMR 1328 1968 SCMR 1328
Article 3 58 () A Single Judge of a High Court Judgment Based on the Division Bench's Decision A Direct Petition for a Special Leave Appeal for a Petitional Appeal of a Petty Appeal Arranged by the Su…
- 1968 SCMR 1329 1968 SCMR 1329
Section 3 (Civil) civil suit material evidence which is neglected by the courts under special leave of appeal by the courts…
- 1968 SCMR 1330 1968 SCMR 1330
Claim a person's schedule for transfer of property through the Settlement Authorities, filed a petition two years after the final approval of the Settlement Commissioner's Petition, which was rejected…
- MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1331
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 496 interim bail was granted before the Supreme Court before the trial began before the magistrate.…
- ALLAH DITTA v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1331
Go to appeal by the accused to get relief from wrongdoing proceedings approved by Pakistan Penal Code Section 394 accused.…
- P. C. SAMPSON v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1332
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Article 253 The exclusion of the Supreme Court does not usually interfere with its exclusive jurisdiction, but appeals to the special court, however, where the complain…
- 1968 SCMR 1333 1968 SCMR 1333
Article 98 Whether a special order appealed by the Supreme Court to an open order for review in a writ jurisdiction exercising the administrative powers of the provincial government…
- 1968 SCMR 1333 1968 SCMR 1333
Article 98 Whether a special order appealed by the Supreme Court to an open order for review in a writ jurisdiction exercising the administrative powers of the provincial government…
- 1968 SCMR 1335 1968 SCMR 1335
Article 58 (3) and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, AXXIV, r 2 Appeal for special leave, in criminal case, is restricted to 29 days ground for the condolence that the applicant is a heart patient and…
- 1968 SCMR 1335 1968 SCMR 1335
Article (58 (raised)) questioned, the Supreme Court denied the special leave of appeal on the mere definition of evidence.…
- 1968 SCMR 1336 1968 SCMR 1336
Appeal for special leave for appeal against conviction in criminal matters (Section 58 ()) Re-examination of the evidence accepted by the courts in relation to section 304A, generally denied by the Su…
- 1968 SCMR 1337 1968 SCMR 1337
The First Schedule person transferred the entire property on the basis of his CH form in the jurisdiction of the Set CHE on the basis of his CH form stating that if he was allowed by the High Court, s…
- 1968 SCMR 1339 1968 SCMR 1339
Article (58 (time)) has been ordered by the affidavit to explain the request for sanctions with a delay of every day, respecting some of the facts that have been alleged.…
- 1968 SCMR 1340 1968 SCMR 1340
Appeal for special leave of appeal against section 302 conviction denied on the question of appreciation of the evidence, constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3):…
- 1968 SCMR 1341 1968 SCMR 1341
Special leave application for appeal to the Supreme Court against the section 302 conviction…
- 1968 SCMR 1342 1968 SCMR 1342
Article (58 ()) and the Supreme Court Rules, 6, 66, OXS, r1 have petitioned for relief on petition that petitioner is not satisfied with high blood pressure and osteoarthritis.…
- 1968 SCMR 1343 1968 SCMR 1343
Article 58 (3) is nothing on record to justify the intervention of a civil petition for special leave appeal…
- 1968 SCMR 1344 1968 SCMR 1344
Section 3 and Criminal Procedure (Y of 1898), Section 498 Criminal Case was subsequently referred to the Tribunal under Act VII of the 1963 High Court, whether it was capable of granting bail, whether…
- 1968 SCMR 1345 1968 SCMR 1345
Article (58 ()) and the rules of the Supreme Court, X 19566, and X XII, r II by by accepting the special leave application for appeal against a person who has been acquitted for 30 days, to be banned …
- 1968 SCMR 1346 1968 SCMR 1346
Section 11 held that the Additional Settlement Commissi9ner passed an order from the Settlement Commissioner (Land) in exercise of the powers conferred on the Chief Settlement Commissioner's report, f…
- ABDUL GHAFOOR v. HAMID 1968 PCRLJ 1348
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 S. 58 (3) read with the rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, by order of acquittal by a private complainant for the appeal of special leave by a special XIII, r 1 do D XXI V…
- 1968 SCMR 1348 1968 SCMR 1348
Section 15 (c) property right before property where the property or property is located…
- 1968 SCMR 1349 1968 SCMR 1349
Under section 2 and 6 (5) of the Anti-Corruption Act (Amendment) Act, 1965, a section 2 amendment has charged an employee of the organizing organization to approve the prosecution.…
- 1968 SCMR 1350 1968 SCMR 1350
O XXl, r 90 Rule of sale aside in the execution of the decree The sale announcement was not published The fact that advertising charges were paid does not indicate that the front of the announcements …
- NABI BAKHSH v. GHULAM.SARWAR 1968 PCRLJ 1352
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 210 and 497 is the question whether, after an adjudication order made under section 2317 High Court, section 497 jurisdiction to grant bail under the cavea…
- 1968 SCMR 1353 1968 SCMR 1353
Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court if the entitled Certificate Officer on Special Duty issued under the rules can be canceled by the Central Record Office on the basis that it was obtained t…
- 1968 SCMR 1354 1968 SCMR 1354
Explain the restriction of days to days in Article (58 ()) and Supreme Court Rules, 1956, XXV, 1P…
- 1968 SCMR 1356 1968 SCMR 1356
Article (58 ()) Special appeal for appeal against the High Court's leave against the High Court decree has been granted in view of the High Court ruling as a reversal and because the law and the facts…
- 1968 SCMR 1357 1968 SCMR 1357
SH, Part 1 The High Court refuses to interfere with the transfer order approved by the Settlement Authorities in the writ jurisdiction…
- 1968 SCMR 1358 1968 SCMR 1358
Appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court order dismissing the request for bail before arrest), Section 498…
- 1968 SCMR 1359 1968 SCMR 1359
Remarks on the decision under Section 1 561 Sections 202020 and 8 468, the PPC accusing the two officials of the bank, making some observations about their integrity and the conduct of the accused and…
- 1968 SCMR 1364 1968 SCMR 1364
Section 13 default in payment of rent…
- 1968 SCMR 1368 1968 SCMR 1368
Sections 302 and 326 were struck with a knife in the abdomen, medical evidence could not clarify whether the injury conviction resulted in peritonitis, which the High Court correctly corrected under S…
- 1968 SCMR 1370 1968 SCMR 1370
Important question of law regarding the interpretation of section 13 special leave appealed by section 13 Supreme Court…
- 1968 SCMR 1372 1968 SCMR 1372
On the private complaint of sections 147 and 431, the magistrate proceeded under section 144, CRPC and after the termination of the legal life under section 144, the accused was issued a summons for o…
- 1968 SCMR 1373 1968 SCMR 1373
Regions authorized by the Regional Transport Authority in the interest of the public, during the passage of the route, unanimously ordered that the buses and trucks manufactured before the 1950 Region…
- 1968 SCMR 1375 1968 SCMR 1375
Sch. Settlement officials found that the re-shop was part of the fact that it was not appropriate to override the writ jurisdiction by the High Court, which was rightly dismissed by the High Court's s…
- 1968 SCMR 1376 1968 SCMR 1376
Article (58 ()) Special Leave Request for Appeal…
- 1968 SCMR 1378 1968 SCMR 1378
Article 98 The High Court held that the petitioner did not openly approach the court in dismissing the writ petition, which was used arbitrarily by the High Court in such a case; The appeal for specia…
- 1968 SCMR 1379 1968 SCMR 1379
Section 5 Off5 Offenses under Section 9409 and 8 468, PPC Offense under Section 8 468, PPC has pledged to cover that Section 9 off9, PPC both offenses are related to each other. And so, in the absence…
- 1968 SCMR 1381 1968 SCMR 1381
Section 124 Regulation reads under Criminal Code (Y of 1898), Sections 196 and 257, under Section 124A, the provincial government signs a complaint order from the PPC home secretary, admission by the …
- 1968 SCMR 1382 1968 SCMR 1382
Sections 302 and 300, exception 1, find the accused on his way to his house having an illicit relationship with his wife's relative, even if no one is entitled to take advantage of the accused, the gr…
- 1968 SCMR 1384 1968 SCMR 1384
Questions permissible under Section 302 and Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), sections 288 and 337, whether any conviction may be based on evidence of passage in any of the special leave to appeal to…
- 1968 SCMR 1385 1968 SCMR 1385
O XXXIX, r 1 Appeal to the Supreme Court Against an Order to Refuse Temporary Sanctions…
- 1968 SCMR 1386 1968 SCMR 1386
The trial court's denial of the defendant's acquittal by the trial court in a section 307 trial, wholly determined by the High Court as a special leave to appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court.…
- 1968 SCMR 1387 1968 SCMR 1387
Special leave allowed for appeal by the Supreme Court cancellation of bail by Section 497 High Court…
- 1968 SCMR 1388 1968 SCMR 1388
In cross-section 7497 and 8498 cross-examination, the bailiff denied the request for special leave of appeal, which was approved in one case under which the persons involved in the other case were all…
- 1968 SCMR 1389 1968 SCMR 1389
The question is, once the PTD (Permanent Exchange process) is released, the settlement options are able to limit the transfer property such that the transfer process itself can be changed to consider …
- 1968 SCMR 1390 1968 SCMR 1390
Seventh Twelfth, r 1 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3) Starting point of application for special leave of appeal: The date of appeal decision against the application is time bound by…
- ABDUL SHAKOOR v. ABDUL SHAKOOR 1968 PCRLJ 1393
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 486 was found to be a crime and a class RI was sentenced to one year by the first class magistrate with better powers, which has been revised, the sentence for the firs…
- 1968 SCMR 1394 1968 SCMR 1394
Article fact 98 The High Court upheld the right to intervene in special leave to appeal to the special court…
- 1968 SCMR 1395 1968 SCMR 1395
In section 302 and the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 497 bail granted in the non-bailable offense, the High Court granted bail to the accused accused to appeal against the High Court orde…
- 1968 SCMR 1399 1968 SCMR 1399
The share of the property has not been transferred to P on the schedule of any of the persons involved in the Schedule to the PTO, the special powers of the High Court directing the department to dire…
- 1968 SCMR 1401 1968 SCMR 1401
Whether the lower courts properly exercised discretion in denying the accused's bail for a special leave appeal approved by the Criminal Code of the Supreme Court (V9 1898), section 497.…
- 1968 SCMR 1401 1968 SCMR 1401
Sections 364 and 147 were not assigned to the accused in the special police report filed for special leave appeal by the Supreme Court.…
- 1968 SCMR 1402 1968 SCMR 1402
Section 145, however, that no action can be taken in connection with a mosque under which the Special Court has been appealed to consider this question.…
- MIRZA ALI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1402
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 561 A complainant was summoned by a magistrate on the basis of certain statements made by the magistrate himself, the magistrate, having the jurisdiction to pro…
- 1968 SCMR 1403 1968 SCMR 1403
Settlement authorities granted the same authority as a civil, court authority under the Civil Procedure Code 1908, on the request of the applicant requesting legal proceedings on the matter before the…
- FAKIR HUSSAIN, DEPUTY POST-MASTER GENERAL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1404
Nothing in evidence to support the theory of Sections 2 & 2 and 4 I Sudden, Part I Sudden Fighting, was mistaken for changing the sentence from section 302 to one of section 302, Part I of the Supreme…
- 1968 SCMR 1404 1968 SCMR 1404
Article 123 violated an ad hoc order passed by High Court litigation, which has been held, does not have the right to decide whether or not this High Court order is appropriate but an apology can be s…
- 1968 SCMR 1408 1968 SCMR 1408
Article (58 ()) and the Supreme Court Rules, X 195 O6, Twelfth, r 1 The time restriction by the application explained that the applicant was critically ill but no medical certificate was filed which i…
- 1968 SCMR 1409 1968 SCMR 1409
Article 58 (3) read with the Supreme Court Rules, 1956; A twelfth, r 1 application has been banned for 49 days stating that the copying agency provided incorrect information about the preparation of t…
- MUHAMMAD YAHYA v. NABI BAKHSH ALIAS NABBAN 1968 PCRLJ 1410
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 and 498 appeal for the grant of bail, which is punishable by death or transportation, to life imprisonment. Supreme Court denies special leave…
- 1968 SCMR 1411 1968 SCMR 1411
SH&E of Pakistan (1962), Article 98, whether a part of the factory should be auctioned by the settlement authorities. The appeal was upheld by the Supreme Court…
- 1968 SCMR 1414 1968 SCMR 1414
The question regarding the evaluation of evidence in section (58 (Cri) criminal case could not be raised in the appeal) before the Supreme Court's special leave to appeal was refused.…
- ISRAR KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1415
Pakistan Penal Code Section 363 defense version accused of abducting the girl was the accused's fianc?e and with his own help, he approached the Supreme Court of Appeal on suspicion of age-old suspici…
- 1968 SCMR 1416 1968 SCMR 1416
Article 62 The reviewing court dismissed the application for a special leave appeal based on the previous case decided by the Court of Fact, however, the suit presented by the counsel appearing in thi…
- 1968 SCMR 1418 1968 SCMR 1418
Article (58 ()) A new appeal cannot be allowed to be raised for the first time before the Supreme Court denies leave.…
- 1968 SCMR 1420 1968 SCMR 1420
Article 8 488 and 948 amendment of maintenance in the circumstances of the main parties…
- 1968 SCMR 1424 1968 SCMR 1424
O XXVI, r 2 Special Appeal to Appeal for Virtual Proceedings Delay for 30 days due to invalid belief of Advocate Clerk was not delayed…
- GUL FARAZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1424
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 and 498, for dealing with petitions under the provisions, do not require the investigation of the prosecution's case or the defense request, against the a…
- 1968 SCMR 1425 1968 SCMR 1425
Section 211 questions whether section 211 provides for a special leave of absence and non-compliance with the trial, which the Supreme Court has asked to consider.…
- 1968 SCMR 1425 1968 SCMR 1425
Article (58 ()) and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, Twelfth Twenty-six, r 1 The day's adjustment was banned in the petition to enable the applicant to file a delayed concession.…
- 1968 SCMR 1427 1968 SCMR 1427
Article 58 (3) and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, O. XIII, r 1, dismissing the request as timely, a separate application for delayed consolation, summarily dismissing the request.…
- 1968 SCMR 1427 1968 SCMR 1427
Section Chairman of the Union Council to withdraw his election petition on the basis of a compromise, the High Court, in any case, the fact that the jurisdiction of the writ has been reviewed by this …
- 1968 SCMR 1429 1968 SCMR 1429
Articles 5435 and 9439, the High Court, within the jurisdiction of the review, are capable of going into the facts and instead of sending the case back to the lower court course by the High Court, rev…
- 1968 SCMR 1432 1968 SCMR 1432
Diverting judicial opinion regarding special leave appealed by section 58 (judicial) Supreme Court…
- 1968 SCMR 1432 1968 SCMR 1432
Section 9 may also consider the needs of a child residing with a fixing care wife under section 9…
- 1968 SCMR 1433 1968 SCMR 1433
, Section 21 (1), the Additional Settlement Commissioner, may automatically review the order passed before it exercises the jurisdiction of the Moto Appeal.…
- 1968 SCMR 1435 1968 SCMR 1435
The Section 7 mother appointed the guardian of the minor daughters to have no money to raise the minor children, which was not properly accepted by the High Court for refusing her prayers.…
- 1968 SCMR 1439 1968 SCMR 1439
Sections 9379 and 111111 denied the lower courts' allegation that the copper wire was alleged to have been stolen, with no identification mark, and the defendant had purchased the wire and purchased t…
- ILLAHI BUX v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1499
The appeal for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the section 302 conviction was emphasized in relation to the definition of evidence, which is not the job of the Supreme Court in cr…
- MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1509
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 452/34, 326/34 and 323/34 refer to the testimony of the petitioner against special conviction under the special leave of appeal.…
- FATEH MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1516
Pakistan Penal Code Section 315 (High Court 1898, alone 438), section 439, in reviewing the magistrate's order, against the directive and re-trial instruction.…
- MASEEL AHMAD v. DR. JAMIL AHMAD KHAN 1968 PCRLJ 1525
Evidence Act 1872 Section 118 Children's testimony cannot be said about the age of 12 (less than 15)…
- GHULAM MUSTAFA v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1531
The Criminal Code for Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 488 Word Child Appeal for a Special Leave Appeal to consider whether the child, including the majority, is involved.…
- ALAF DIN v. MST. PARVEEN AKHTAR 1968 PCRLJ 1531
Section 302 assassinated ZS and S with a knife with a knife, causing fatal injuries that led to unlawful opportunities while S was convicted under Section 324, PPC and sentenced to only 1 year RI. The…
- YOUNAS QURESHI v. MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR 1968 PCRLJ 1533
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 has been charged with criminal breach of trust that it entrusted with the actual signatures of its superiors in support of the receipt of its application which it w…
- HABIB-UR-RAHMAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1545
Guaranteed offense under Section 4A4A, PPC High Court revoked the bail of the accused who witnessed the offense under Section 49A, PPC and no special circumstances were considered under section 497. W…
- MUHAMMAD YAQUB v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1560
Dissatisfaction with Progress in Transferring the Case of the High Court to the Complainant Who Complaints to the President Against the Legal Practitioner Accusing the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) …
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.